These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36802954)

  • 1. Prediction of Drivers' Subjective Evaluation of Vehicle Reaction Under Aerodynamic Excitations.
    Kumar A; Sällström E; Sebben S; Jacobson B; Amiri K
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1600-1615. PubMed ID: 36802954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):544-561. PubMed ID: 35469464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance-oriented advanced curve speed warning system in a connected vehicle environment.
    Wang S; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105801. PubMed ID: 33128990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Definition of simulated driving tests for the evaluation of drivers' reactions and responses.
    Bartolozzi R; Frendo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 24372503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movement as a function to explore the effects of improved signs design and audio warning on drivers' behavior at STOP-sign-controlled grade crossings.
    Liu R; Yan X; Ma S; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106693. PubMed ID: 35552119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious U.S. crashes.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():211-9. PubMed ID: 25916662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the influence of 0.03%, 0.05% and 0.08% blood alcohol concentrations on lane positioning and steering control of Indian drivers.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):343-348. PubMed ID: 33979247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.
    Brooks JO; Crisler MC; Klein N; Goodenough R; Beeco RW; Guirl C; Tyler PJ; Hilpert A; Miller Y; Grygier J; Burroughs B; Martin A; Ray R; Palmer C; Beck C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):698-705. PubMed ID: 21376857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A video based run-off-road training program with practice and evaluation in a simulator.
    Freeman P; Neyens DM; Wagner J; Switzer F; Alexander K; Pidgeon P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():1-9. PubMed ID: 26005742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Car drivers coping with hazardous events in real versus simulated situations: Declarative, behavioral and physiological data used to assess drivers' feeling of presence.
    Gemonet E; Bougard C; Masfrand S; Honnet V; Mestre DR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247373. PubMed ID: 33606849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling driver's braking and steering behavior along horizontal curves of two-lane rural highways for ADAS applications.
    Choudhari T; Maji A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(7):404-409. PubMed ID: 35862932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of freeway curve characteristics on drivers' speed perception accuracy.
    Xu J; Li H; Zhang X; Ma F; Sun Z
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267250. PubMed ID: 35507563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in Driver Behavior between Manual and Automatic Turning of an Inverted Pendulum Vehicle.
    Nakagawa C; Yamada S; Hirata D; Shintani A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the impact of HMI on drivers' merging performance in intelligent connected vehicle environment.
    Wang Y; Lyu N; Wu C; Du Z; Deng M; Wu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107448. PubMed ID: 38340472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.