These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36803325)

  • 1. Management of patients with impella devices or intra-aortic balloon pumps during helicopter air ambulance transport in observational data.
    Connelly KM; Winslow SE; Smith J; Ahmad SS; Xie C; Hinckley WR; Gottula AL; Lane BH
    Perfusion; 2024 May; 39(4):752-758. PubMed ID: 36803325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-aortic Balloon Pump-Dependent Patient Transports by Critical Care Paramedics.
    MacDonald RD; Allendes F
    Air Med J; 2016; 35(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 27393759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-aortic balloon pump is associated with the lowest whereas Impella with the highest inpatient mortality and complications regardless of severity or hospital types.
    Movahed MR; Talle A; Hashemzadeh M
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2024 Jul; 39(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 38555535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
    Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results.
    Januszek R; Pawlik A; Rzeszutko Ł; Bartuś K; Bartuś S
    Kardiol Pol; 2022; 80(12):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 36047958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous left ventricular assist support is associated with less pulmonary congestion and lower rate of pneumonia in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Haberkorn S; Uwarow A; Haurand J; Jung C; Kelm M; Westenfeld R; Horn P
    Open Heart; 2020 Nov; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 33132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical efficacy of direct or indirect left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary cardiogenic shock.
    Char S; Fried J; Melehy A; Mehta S; Ning Y; Kurlansky P; Takeda K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 165(2):699-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34243933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella
    Frain K; Rees P
    Perfusion; 2024 Jan; 39(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 34479465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5.
    Manzo-Silberman S; Fichet J; Mathonnet A; Varenne O; Ricome S; Chaib A; Zuber B; Spaulding C; Cariou A
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 23069592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis.
    Lansky AJ; Tirziu D; Moses JW; Pietras C; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Ekono MM; Grines CL; Parise H
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 185():29-36. PubMed ID: 36210212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Observational Study.
    Yeo I; Axman R; Lu DY; Feldman DN; Cheung JW; Minutello RM; Karas MG; Iannacone EM; Srivastava A; Girardi NI; Naka Y; Wong SC; Kim LK
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Feb; 13(3):e032607. PubMed ID: 38240236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.