179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36804302)
1. Standard quality criteria in retracted vs nonretracted obstetrical randomized controlled trials.
Anderson KM; Doulaveris G; Bennett C; Mol BW; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 May; 5(5):100889. PubMed ID: 36804302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: obstetrical journal guidelines.
Anderson K; Romero R; Odibo AO; Rouse D; Marsh M; Acharya G; Chitty L; Ortmann O; Geary M; Gratacos E; Gallagher PG; Gupta J; Renzo GCD; Maulik D; de Costa C; Saade G; Dudenhausen JW; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100334. PubMed ID: 33607321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future.
Bennett C; Chambers LM; Al-Hafez L; Michener CM; Falcone T; Yao M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 Nov; 2(4):100201. PubMed ID: 33345918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals.
Doulaveris G; Vani K; Saccone G; Chauhan SP; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100509. PubMed ID: 34656731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics and gynecology.
Bruno AM; Olmsted MW; Martin V; Einerson BD; Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Scott JR; Blue NR
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6):100450. PubMed ID: 34325015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology.
Chambers LM; Michener CM; Falcone T
BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 30903641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.
Christopher MM
BMC Vet Res; 2022 Feb; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 35180878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surveillance of clinical research integrity in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review of retracted publications.
Minetto S; Zanirato M; Makieva S; Marzanati D; Esposito S; Pisaturo V; Costa M; Candiani M; Papaleo E; Alteri A
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1210951. PubMed ID: 37588117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of retractions of dental publications.
Faggion CM; Ware RS; Bakas N; Wasiak J
J Dent; 2018 Dec; 79():19-23. PubMed ID: 30205129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retracted articles in surgery journals. What are surgeons doing wrong?
Cassão BD; Herbella FAM; Schlottmann F; Patti MG
Surgery; 2018 Jun; 163(6):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 29525734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A survey of retracted articles in dentistry.
Nogueira TE; Gonçalves AS; Leles CR; Batista AC; Costa LR
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):253. PubMed ID: 28683764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine.
Chauvin A; De Villelongue C; Pateron D; Yordanov Y
Eur J Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 26(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 28825929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals.
Wang T; Xing QR; Wang H; Chen W
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):855-868. PubMed ID: 29516389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals.
Carlisle JB
Anaesthesia; 2017 Aug; 72(8):944-952. PubMed ID: 28580651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Citations of microRNA Biomarker Articles That Were Retracted: A Systematic Review.
Zhu H; Jia Y; Leung SW
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Mar; 7(3):e243173. PubMed ID: 38512253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retracted Publications in Medical Imaging Literature: an Analysis Using the Retraction Watch Database.
Kwee RM; Kwee TC
Acad Radiol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 35977877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.
Trikalinos NA; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):464-70. PubMed ID: 18394539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature.
Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
Account Res; 2021 Jul; 28(5):280-296. PubMed ID: 33124464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
