These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36804431)

  • 21. Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ren Y; Nian Y; Sun T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Apr; 25(1):315. PubMed ID: 38654251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.
    Fan Z; Wu X; Guo Z; Shen N; Chen B; Xiang H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):186. PubMed ID: 38424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Yu Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Xu J; Chen Y; Fan X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 36708116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han H; Song Y; Li Y; Zhou H; Fu Y; Li J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 37667363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.
    Wu J; Zhang C; Lu K; Li C; Zhou Y
    Pain Physician; 2019 Nov; 22(6):E587-E599. PubMed ID: 31775412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.
    Shi L; Ding T; Shi Y; Wang F; Wu C
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1231-e1240. PubMed ID: 36096389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Luan H; Peng C; Liu K; Song X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Nov; 18(1):888. PubMed ID: 37993948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Chen M; Cui J; Liu Y; Cai Z; Yang C; Liu H; Chen Y; Yao Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 38287376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].
    Pu XY; Luo WY; Gao MX; Ma GF; Zhang C; Chi F; Qian YW
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 May; 35(5):409-17. PubMed ID: 35535527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study.
    Arunakul R; Anumas S; Pattharanitima P; Susrivaraput C; Pholsawatchai W
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jun; 19(1):326. PubMed ID: 38824551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and open-TLIF with bilateral decompression for degenerative lumbar diseases: a retrospective cohort study.
    Zhu F; Jia D; Zhang Y; Feng C; Ning Y; Leng X; Zhou Y; Li C; Huang B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Feb; 19(1):150. PubMed ID: 38378729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion.
    Gatam AR; Gatam L; Mahadhipta H; Ajiantoro A; Luthfi O; Aprilya D
    Orthop Res Rev; 2021; 13():229-239. PubMed ID: 34853540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
    Liu G; Liu W; Jin D; Yan P; Yang Z; Liu R
    Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):271-280. PubMed ID: 36252809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Tian Y; Liu X
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the Medium-term Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Discectomy and Fusion with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Song C; Deng Z; Dai H; Zheng W; Yu G; Wu Y; Luo J; Xu J
    Orthop Surg; 2024 May; 16(5):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 38531809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.