BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36804770)

  • 21. The impact of the lookback period and definition of confirmatory events on the identification of incident cancer cases in administrative data.
    Czwikla J; Jobski K; Schink T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):122. PubMed ID: 28806932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Disparities in stage at diagnosis for five common cancers in China: a multicentre, hospital-based, observational study.
    Zeng H; Ran X; An L; Zheng R; Zhang S; Ji JS; Zhang Y; Chen W; Wei W; He J;
    Lancet Public Health; 2021 Dec; 6(12):e877-e887. PubMed ID: 34838194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implementation of an algorithm for the identification of breast cancer deaths in German health insurance claims data: a validation study based on a record linkage with administrative mortality data.
    Langner I; Ohlmeier C; Haug U; Hense HW; Czwikla J; Zeeb H
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e026834. PubMed ID: 31350240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.
    Robertson C; Arcot Ragupathy SK; Boachie C; Dixon JM; Fraser C; Hernández R; Heys S; Jack W; Kerr GR; Lawrence G; MacLennan G; Maxwell A; McGregor J; Mowatt G; Pinder S; Ternent L; Thomas RE; Vale L; Wilson R; Zhu S; Gilbert FJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(34):v-vi, 1-322. PubMed ID: 21951942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Methodology and Attribution Success of a Data Linkage of Clinical Registry Data with Health Insurance Data].
    Bobeth C; Tol KK; Rößler M; Bierbaum V; Gerken M; Günster C; Dröge P; Ruhnke T; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Schmitt J; Schoffer O
    Gesundheitswesen; 2023 Mar; 85(S 02):S154-S161. PubMed ID: 36940697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating factors associated with unknown SEER Summary Stage 2000 derived from collaborative stage at central registry level.
    Hsieh MC; Yu Q; Wu XC; Wohler B; Fan Y; Qiao B; Jemal A; Ajani UA
    J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 23443453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using Medicare data to estimate the number of cases missed by a cancer registry: a 3-source capture-recapture model.
    McClish D; Penberthy L
    Med Care; 2004 Nov; 42(11):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15586838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using clinical cancer registry data for estimation of quality indicators: Results from the Norwegian breast cancer registry.
    Hartmann-Johnsen OJ; Kåresen R; Schlichting E; Naume B; Nygård JF
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 May; 125():102-109. PubMed ID: 30914174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opportunities and obstacles in linking large health care registries: the primary secondary cancer care registry - breast cancer.
    Heins MJ; de Ligt KM; Verloop J; Siesling S; Korevaar JC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):124. PubMed ID: 35477392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases.
    Baldi I; Vicari P; Di Cuonzo D; Zanetti R; Pagano E; Rosato R; Sacerdote C; Segnan N; Merletti F; Ciccone G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 18313562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of incident breast and colorectal cancer cases from an administrative healthcare database in Catalonia, Spain.
    Escribà JM; Banqué M; Macià F; Gálvez J; Esteban L; Pareja L; Clèries R; Sanz X; Castells X; Borrás JM; Ribes J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jun; 22(6):943-952. PubMed ID: 31586294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The accuracy of Japanese claims data in identifying breast cancer cases.
    Sato I; Yagata H; Ohashi Y
    Biol Pharm Bull; 2015; 38(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 25744458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feasibility of Capturing Cancer Treatment Data in the Utah All-Payer Claims Database.
    Hashibe M; Ou JY; Herget K; Bolton D; McPherson J; Hawley C; Garvin J; Doherty JA; Sweeney C
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 Oct; 3():1-10. PubMed ID: 31756128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of patterns of care of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients in a younger and Medigap commercially insured cohort.
    Hillner BE; McDonald MK; Desch CE; Smith TJ; Penberthy LT; Retchin SM
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(9):1930-7. PubMed ID: 9806651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intended Versus Inferred Treatment After
    Hillner BE; Hanna L; Makineni R; Duan F; Shields AF; Subramaniam RM; Gareen I; Siegel BA
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Mar; 59(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 29191854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-Term Observation of Patients With Cancer - an Entity-Independent Registry for Healthcare and Translational Research at the University Medicine Dresden (Cancer-Reg-VT).
    Datzmann T; Schoffer O; Schmitt J; Böhme H; Fritzmann J; Distler M; Ubbelohde U; Giehl-Brown E; Henke T; Krause M; Glimm H; Bornhäuser M; Weitz J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2023 Sep; 85(S 03):S226-S234. PubMed ID: 37751759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sampling strategy, characteristics and representativeness of the InGef research database.
    Ludwig M; Enders D; Basedow F; Walker J; Jacob J
    Public Health; 2022 May; 206():57-62. PubMed ID: 35378455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of 7th and 8th editions of the UICC/AJCC TNM staging for non-small cell lung cancer in a non-metastatic North American cohort undergoing primary radiation treatment.
    Koul R; Rathod S; Dubey A; Bashir B; Chowdhury A
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():116-120. PubMed ID: 30089581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Representativeness of the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry. Comparison of sociodemographic data with other national registries].
    Candal-Pedreira C; Ruano-Ravina A; Carcereny E; Rodríguez-Abreu D; Guirado-Risueño M; López-Castro R; Massutí B; Blasco A; Ortega AL; Provencio M
    Gac Sanit; 2022; 36(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 35637054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer.
    Du X; Freeman JL; Warren JL; Nattinger AB; Zhang D; Goodwin JS
    Med Care; 2000 Jul; 38(7):719-27. PubMed ID: 10901355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.