196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36806156)
1. ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators.
Begg J; Jelen U; Moutrie Z; Oliver C; Holloway L; Brown R;
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 36806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying uncertainties associated with reference dosimetry in an MR-Linac.
Iakovenko V; Keller B; Malkov VN; Sahgal A; Sarfehnia A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 24(11):e14087. PubMed ID: 37354202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consequences of air around an ionization chamber: Are existing solid phantoms suitable for reference dosimetry on an MR-linac?
Hackett SL; van Asselen B; Wolthaus JW; Kok JG; Woodings SJ; Lagendijk JJ; Raaymakers BW
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):3961. PubMed ID: 27370114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental measurement of ionization chamber angular response and associated magnetic field correction factors in MR-linac.
Iakovenko V; Keller B; Sahgal A; Sarfehnia A
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1940-1948. PubMed ID: 31955432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors.
Woodings SJ; van Asselen B; van Soest TL; de Prez LA; Lagendijk JJW; Raaymakers BW; Wolthaus JWH
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3739-3745. PubMed ID: 31131902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental determination of magnetic field correction factors for ionization chambers in parallel and perpendicular orientations.
Pojtinger S; Nachbar M; Ghandour S; Pisaturo O; Pachoud M; Kapsch RP; Thorwarth D
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245044. PubMed ID: 33181493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A Survey of Dosimetry in the Magnetic Field of MR-Linacs].
Sato Y; Abe K; Tsuneda M; Yasui K; Kawachi T; Tohyama N; Mizuno H; Fujita Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2023; 43(4):107-124. PubMed ID: 38417889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute dosimetry of a 1.5 T MR-guided accelerator-based high-energy photon beam in water and solid phantoms using Aerrow.
Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Bancheri J; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1291-1304. PubMed ID: 31834640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical reference dosimetry for the 0.5 T inline rotating biplanar Linac-MR.
Yip E; Tari SY; Reynolds MW; Sinn D; Murray BR; Fallone BG; Oliver PA
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2933-2940. PubMed ID: 38308821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct determination of [Formula: see text] for cylindrical ionization chambers in a 6 MV 0.35 T MR-linac.
Krauss A; Spindeldreier CK; Klüter S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235049. PubMed ID: 33300501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.
O'Brien DJ; Dolan J; Pencea S; Schupp N; Sawakuchi GO
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):884-897. PubMed ID: 29178457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetry in 1.5 T MR-Linacs: Monte Carlo determination of magnetic field correction factors and investigation of the air gap effect.
Margaroni V; Pappas EP; Episkopakis A; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Marinos N; Karaiskos P
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1132-1148. PubMed ID: 36349535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental characterisation of the magnetic field correction factor,kB⃗,for Roos chambers in a parallel MRI-linac.
Begg J; Jelen U; Keall P; Liney G; Holloway L
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 67(9):. PubMed ID: 35413694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the dosimeter-specific corrections for influence quantities of some parallel-plate ionization chambers in conventional electron beam dosimetry.
Baghani HR; Robatjazi M; Andreoli S
Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Jan; 179():110031. PubMed ID: 34801928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo optimization and experimental validation of a prototype ionization chamber for accurate magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) daily output constancy measurements in solid phantoms.
Muir BR; Nusrat H; Sarfehnia A; Renaud J
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5483-5490. PubMed ID: 35536047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference dosimetry in MRI-linacs: evaluation of available protocols and data to establish a Code of Practice.
de Pooter J; Billas I; de Prez L; Duane S; Kapsch RP; Karger CP; van Asselen B; Wolthaus J
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(5):05TR02. PubMed ID: 32570225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ACPSEM position paper: the safety of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators.
Cook N; Shelton N; Gibson S; Barnes P; Alinaghi-Zadeh R; Jameson MG;
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):19-43. PubMed ID: 36847966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ACPSEM position paper on ROMP scope of practice and staffing levels for magnetic resonance linear accelerators.
Marsh L; Rykers K; Sobolewski M;
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Jun; 46(2):521-527. PubMed ID: 37041317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CyberKnife reference dosimetry: An assessment of the impact of evolving recommendations on correction factors and measured dose.
Buchegger N; Grogan G; Hug B; Oliver C; Ebert M
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3573-3585. PubMed ID: 32311095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dosimetry in magnetic fields with Farmer-type ionization chambers: determination of magnetic field correction factors for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations.
Spindeldreier CK; Schrenk O; Bakenecker A; Kawrakow I; Burigo L; Karger CP; Greilich S; Pfaffenberger A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6708-6728. PubMed ID: 28636564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
