140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36806165)
1. Assessment of 2D and 3D imaging for patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Wang MF; Thapa D
Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 Mar; 95(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 36806165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass based on the experience of a newly created bariatric center.
Dworak J; Wysocki M; Rzepa A; Pędziwiatr M; Radkowiak D; Budzyński A; Major P
Pol Przegl Chir; 2020 May; 92(4):23-30. PubMed ID: 32908016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bariatric tourists. Foreign bariatric patients treated in Poland - a survey based study.
Kowalewski P; Janik M; Kwiatkowski A; Paśnik K; Walędziak M
Pol Przegl Chir; 2020 May; 92(4):12-16. PubMed ID: 32908015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Peltrini R; Esposito MD; Pacella D; Calabrese P; Vitiello A; Pilone V
Obes Surg; 2024 Jun; 34(6):2177-2185. PubMed ID: 38630144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Port site metastases a year after initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Should the use of retrieval bags during laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the new gold standard?
Petryshyn N; Dražić T; Hogendorf P; Strzelczyk J; Strzałka A; Szwedziak K; Durczyński A
Pol Przegl Chir; 2021 May; 93(6):61-65. PubMed ID: 36169533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.
Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional laparoscopic gastric bypass for manual gastrojejunal anastomosis: A prospective and randomized trial.
Rojano-Rodríguez M; Torres-Ruíz M; Cuendis-Velazquez A; Romero-Loera LS; Reséndiz-Barragán M; Rentería-Palomo E; Vazquez-Cárdenas P; Moreno-Portillo M
Cir Cir; 2020; 88(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 32116321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selected factors affecting the rate of reduction of body weight components during the first six months after bariatric surgery: A cohort study.
Iljin A; Antoszewski B; Szewczyk T; Sitek A
Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Oct; 96(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 38353095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.
Salati SA; Alfehaid M; Alsuwaydani S; AlSulaim L
Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 May; 95(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 36805307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of life in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to gallstone disease - evaluation of long-term postoperative results.
Gach T; Bogacki P; Markowska B; Bonior J; Paplaczyk M; Szura M
Pol Przegl Chir; 2021 Oct; 93(0):19-24. PubMed ID: 35384862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peritoneal and Systemic Interleukin-10 as Early Biomarkers for Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage Following Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Villegas-Coronado L; Villegas-Coronado K; Villegas Coronado D
Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Nov; 96(0):135-142. PubMed ID: 38348991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can minimally invasive surgical techniques reduce the incidence of postoperative adhesions?
Tazeoğlu D; Benli S; Tikici D; Esmer AC; Dirlik MM
Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 Feb; 94(5):23-30. PubMed ID: 36169587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic organ-sparing surgery for cystic lesions of the spleen - own observations.
Zaręba KP; Cummings K; Dorf J; Kamocki Z; Kędra B
Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 Jan; 94(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 36169581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified optical port entry site for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our experience.
Shinde P; Gajjar A; Karvande R
Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Oct; 96(0):23-25. PubMed ID: 38348983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of complications after laparoscopic surgery of kidney tumors using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Kierstan A; Konecki T; Jabłonowski Z
Pol Przegl Chir; 2020 Apr; 92(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 32908012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures.
Tice JA; Karliner L; Walsh J; Petersen AJ; Feldman MD
Am J Med; 2008 Oct; 121(10):885-93. PubMed ID: 18823860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 13 years of hand surgery without an anesthesiologist. An analysis of efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists.
Żyluk A
Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Nov; 96(0):30-35. PubMed ID: 38348976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies.
Han Y; Jia Y; Wang H; Cao L; Zhao Y
Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():101-110. PubMed ID: 32151750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dirie NI; Wang Q; Wang S
J Endourol; 2018 Sep; 32(9):781-790. PubMed ID: 29969912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]