166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36806639)
1. A comparative study of scoring systems that accurately predict the prognosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
Yeon SH; Moon HS; Choi SW; Kang SH; Sung JK; Jeong HY
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Feb; 38(1):51. PubMed ID: 36806639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CHAMPS score in predicting mortality of patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Aydin H; Berikol GB; Erdogan MO; Gemici E; Doğan H
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(4):e20221052. PubMed ID: 37075441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the AIMS65 and pre-endoscopy Rockall scores in the prediction of mortality in patients with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kılıç M; Ak R; Dalkılınç Hökenek U; Alışkan H
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Dec; 29(1):100-104. PubMed ID: 36588521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which scoring system should be used for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding? Old or new?
Jeon HJ; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Jeong HY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 36(10):2819-2827. PubMed ID: 34031928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ak R; Hökenek NM
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2021 Jun; 67(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 34550270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A new prediction score model for Japanese patients.
Iino C; Mikami T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
Dig Endosc; 2016 Nov; 28(7):714-721. PubMed ID: 27061908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AIMS65 predicts prognosis of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding; a comparison with other risk-scoring systems.
Hirai R; Shimodate Y; Minami M; Ishikawa S; Kanadani T; Takezawa R; Doi A; Nishimura N; Mouri H; Matsueda K; Yamamoto H; Mizuno M
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Dec; 33(12):1480-1484. PubMed ID: 33252414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
