199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3680774)
1. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.
Van Tasell DJ; Soli SD; Kirby VM; Widin GP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1152-61. PubMed ID: 3680774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition.
Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP; Cote HA
J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2046366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of the envelope difference index to spectrally sparse speech.
Souza P; Hoover E; Gallun F
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):824-37. PubMed ID: 22232401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants.
Van Tasell DJ; Greenfield DG; Logemann JJ; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1247-57. PubMed ID: 1401513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consonant confusions in amplitude-expanded speech.
Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP
J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1124-37. PubMed ID: 8959598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.
Dubno JR; Levitt H
J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 7217523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of temporal-envelope cues in consonant recognition.
van der Horst R; Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1801-9. PubMed ID: 10089603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
Xu L; Zheng Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.
Xu L; Thompson CS; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3255-67. PubMed ID: 15957791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.
Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2670-80. PubMed ID: 8207140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing speech envelope by integrating hair-cell adaptation into cochlear implant processing.
Azadpour M; Smith RL
Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():48-57. PubMed ID: 27697486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
