152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36807744)
101. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (Dargent's operation): a critical review of the literature.
Dursun P; LeBlanc E; Nogueira MC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 33(8):933-41. PubMed ID: 17208407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
102. Staging early cervical cancer in China: data from a multicenter collaborative.
Zhang W; Chen C; Liu P; Li W; Hao M; Zhao W; Lu A; Ni Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 May; ():. PubMed ID: 31097513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
103. Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging.
Soares LC; de Souza RJ; Oliveira MAP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Dec; 102(12):1757-1758. PubMed ID: 37592393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
104. Multiple management strategies to prolong gestational period after radical trachelectomy.
Ito M; Yoneda S; Shiozaki A; Fukuta K; Yoneda N; Saito S
Clin Case Rep; 2019 Oct; 7(10):1939-1944. PubMed ID: 31624613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
105. British Society of Urogenital Radiology (BSUR) commentary: FIGO staging of endometrial cancer 2023 update - implications for imaging.
Wiles R; Cuthbert F; Brochwicz-Lewinski M; Bharwani N
Clin Radiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38760266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
106. Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions.
Terzic M; Makhadiyeva D; Bila J; Andjic M; Dotlic J; Aimagambetova G; Sarria-Santamera A; Laganà AS; Chiantera V; Vukovic I; Kocijancic Belovic D; Aksam S; Bapayeva G; Terzic S
J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 37048696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. Development of a combined model incorporating clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging features to enhance the predictive value of a prognostic model for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Lin C; Yang F; Guo B; Xiao N; Liao D; Liu P; Jiang Y; Li J; Ni X
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1284493. PubMed ID: 38074674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
108. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
Bentivegna E; Maulard A; Pautier P; Chargari C; Gouy S; Morice P
Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1195-1211.e5. PubMed ID: 27430207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes after abdominal trachelectomy using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis.
Okugawa K; Yahata H; Ohgami T; Yasunaga M; Asanoma K; Kobayashi H; Kato K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e41. PubMed ID: 36807744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
111. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy as Fertility-Preserving Treatment for Patients with FIGO 2018 Stage 1B2 Cervical Cancer.
Zusterzeel PLM; Aarts JWM; Pol FJM; Ottevanger PB; van Ham MAPC
Oncologist; 2020 Jul; 25(7):e1051-e1059. PubMed ID: 32339376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
112. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes of early stage cervical cancer with abdominal radical trachelectomy: Single-institution experience.
Tamauchi S; Kajiyama H; Sakata J; Sekiya R; Suzuki S; Mizuno M; Utsumi F; Niimi K; Kotani T; Shibata K; Kikkawa F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1796-1801. PubMed ID: 27528387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
113. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
114. Long term oncologic and reproductive outcomes after robot-assisted radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. An international multicenter study.
Ekdahl L; Paraghamian S; Eoh KJ; Thumuluru KM; Butler-Manuel SA; Kim YT; Boggess JF; Persson J; Falconer H
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):529-534. PubMed ID: 34980514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
115. Fertility-sparing surgery of cervical cancer >2 cm (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IB1-IIA) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Tesfai FM; Kroep JR; Gaarenstroom K; De Kroon C; Van Loenhout R; Smit V; Trimbos B; Nout RA; van Poelgeest MIE; Beltman JJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 31744889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review.
Morice P; Maulard A; Scherier S; Sanson C; Zarokian J; Zaccarini F; Espenel S; Pautier P; Leary A; Genestie C; Chargari C; Grynberg M; Gouy S
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 165(1):169-183. PubMed ID: 35241291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
117.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
118.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
119.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
120.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
