These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3680780)

  • 1. Principal-component amplitude compression for the hearing impaired.
    Bustamante DK; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1227-42. PubMed ID: 3680780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bustamante DK; Braida LD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):149-60. PubMed ID: 3430374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
    Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):885-94. PubMed ID: 1939893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of orthogonal polynomial compression.
    Levitt H; Neuman AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):241-52. PubMed ID: 1880295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of amplified speech by listeners with hearing loss: acoustic correlates.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Kopun J; Mace A; Lewis DE; Nittrouer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Sep; 98(3):1388-99. PubMed ID: 7560508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise.
    Walker G; Byrne D; Dillon H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):746-57. PubMed ID: 6491047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Crain TR; Yund EW
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 8654908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
    Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1236-49. PubMed ID: 3198862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral cues to perception of /d, n, l/ by normal- and impaired-hearing listeners.
    Revoile SG; Pickett JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):787-98. PubMed ID: 1939885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.
    De Gennaro S; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3958996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1197-212. PubMed ID: 11303933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Preminger J; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 4010249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.