219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36808333)
1. Marginal gap distance and cyclic fatigue loading for different all-ceramic endocrowns.
Elsayed SM; Emam ZN; Abu-Nawareg M; Zidan AZ; Elsisi HA; Abuelroos EM; Fansa HA; Shokier HMR; Elbanna KA
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(3):879-887. PubMed ID: 36808333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging.
Taha D; Spintzyk S; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jul; 30(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 30113129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading.
El Ghoul W; Özcan M; Silwadi M; Salameh Z
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31067007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review.
AlHelal AA
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal adaptation and fracture strength of endocrowns manufactured with different restorative materials: SEM and mechanical evaluation.
Sağlam G; Cengiz S; Karacaer Ö
Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Feb; 84(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 32915479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Analysis of Marginal Adaptation Values between Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
Alwadai GS; Al Moaleem MM; Daghrery AA; Albar NH; Daghriri AA; AlGhamdi MM; Ageel SE; Daghreeri FAA; Al-Amri TMA; Aridhi WH; Almnea RA; Alhendi KD
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Dec; 29():e942649. PubMed ID: 38148601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns.
Rocca GT; Daher R; Saratti CM; Sedlacek R; Suchy T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():41-50. PubMed ID: 29107134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Anderson RE; Maia HP; Giannini M; Magne P
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26266647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Failure loads of heat-pressed versus milled lithium disilicate endocrowns.
Shafi MA; Rayyan MR
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):339-344. PubMed ID: 36197546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study.
El Ghoul WA; Özcan M; Ounsi H; Tohme H; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):128-134. PubMed ID: 31027958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparative Study of the Marginal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Attar E; Alshali S; Abuhaimed T
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40081. PubMed ID: 37292110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of different preparation designs and all ceramic materials on fracture strength of molar endocrowns.
Haralur SB; Alamrey AA; Alshehri SA; Alzahrani DS; Alfarsi M
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020947329. PubMed ID: 33151780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endocrowns Clinical Performance and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Monolithic Ceramic Restorations.
El-Ma'aita A; A Al-Rabab'ah M; Abu-Awwad M; Hattar S; Devlin H
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34378269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of Ferrule on the Marginal Gap and Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Endocrowns.
Bamajboor A; Dudley J
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 36125874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite.
Frankenberger R; Winter J; Dudek MC; Naumann M; Amend S; Braun A; Krämer N; Roggendorf MJ
Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 34947327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of different CAD/CAM materials on internal and marginal adaptations and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations with: 3D finite element analysis.
El-Farag SAA; Elerian FA; Elsherbiny AA; Abbas MH
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 37357307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
