These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36808472)

  • 1. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
    Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.
    Reinstaller T; Adolf D; Lorenz E; Croner RS; Benedix F
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3357-3365. PubMed ID: 36066670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
    de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
    Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
    Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
    Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.
    Grimminger PP; Staubitz JI; Perez D; Ghadban T; Reeh M; Scognamiglio P; Izbicki JR; Biebl M; Fuchs H; Bruns CJ; Lang H; Becker T; Egberts JH
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Oct; 25(10):2463-2469. PubMed ID: 34145494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).
    van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Merboth F; Nebelung H; Wotschel N; Liebscher H; Eckert F; von Renesse J; Hasanovic J; Welsch T; Fritzmann J; Stange DE; Plodeck V; Hoffmann RT; Distler M; Weitz J; Kirchberg J
    J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):232-244. PubMed ID: 36343921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome-a single institution experience.
    Sayed AI; Goel S; Aggarwal A; Singh S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 34228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with side-to-side semi-mechanical anastomosis: analysis of a learning curve.
    Rebecchi F; Bonomo LD; Salzano A; Camandona M; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 35403978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.