189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36808472)
1. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.
Reinstaller T; Adolf D; Lorenz E; Croner RS; Benedix F
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3357-3365. PubMed ID: 36066670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.
Grimminger PP; Staubitz JI; Perez D; Ghadban T; Reeh M; Scognamiglio P; Izbicki JR; Biebl M; Fuchs H; Bruns CJ; Lang H; Becker T; Egberts JH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Oct; 25(10):2463-2469. PubMed ID: 34145494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).
van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Merboth F; Nebelung H; Wotschel N; Liebscher H; Eckert F; von Renesse J; Hasanovic J; Welsch T; Fritzmann J; Stange DE; Plodeck V; Hoffmann RT; Distler M; Weitz J; Kirchberg J
J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):232-244. PubMed ID: 36343921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome-a single institution experience.
Sayed AI; Goel S; Aggarwal A; Singh S
J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 34228249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
