130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809008)
1. Assessment and Comparison of Database Search Engines for Peptidomic Applications.
De La Toba EA; Anapindi KDB; Sweedler JV
J Proteome Res; 2023 Oct; 22(10):3123-3134. PubMed ID: 36809008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.
Audain E; Uszkoreit J; Sachsenberg T; Pfeuffer J; Liang X; Hermjakob H; Sanchez A; Eisenacher M; Reinert K; Tabb DL; Kohlbacher O; Perez-Riverol Y
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 150():170-182. PubMed ID: 27498275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peptide identifications and false discovery rates using different mass spectrometry platforms.
Anapindi KDB; Romanova EV; Southey BR; Sweedler JV
Talanta; 2018 May; 182():456-463. PubMed ID: 29501178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative database search engine analysis on massive tandem mass spectra of pork-based food products for halal proteomics.
Amir SH; Yuswan MH; Aizat WM; Mansor MK; Desa MNM; Yusof YA; Song LK; Mustafa S
J Proteomics; 2021 Jun; 241():104240. PubMed ID: 33894373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MSblender: A probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines.
Kwon T; Choi H; Vogel C; Nesvizhskii AI; Marcotte EM
J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul; 10(7):2949-58. PubMed ID: 21488652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PepArML: A Meta-Search Peptide Identification Platform for Tandem Mass Spectra.
Edwards NJ
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2013 Dec; 44(1323):13.23.1-23. PubMed ID: 25663956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines.
Jones AR; Siepen JA; Hubbard SJ; Paton NW
Proteomics; 2009 Mar; 9(5):1220-9. PubMed ID: 19253293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretation of Tandem Mass Spectra of Posttranslationally Modified Peptides.
Bunkenborg J; Matthiesen R
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2051():199-230. PubMed ID: 31552630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines.
Yu W; Taylor JA; Davis MT; Bonilla LE; Lee KA; Auger PL; Farnsworth CC; Welcher AA; Patterson SD
Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1172-89. PubMed ID: 20101609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of Search Engines and Postprocessing Approaches to Maximize Peptide and Protein Identification for High-Resolution Mass Data.
Tu C; Sheng Q; Li J; Ma D; Shen X; Wang X; Shyr Y; Yi Z; Qu J
J Proteome Res; 2015 Nov; 14(11):4662-73. PubMed ID: 26390080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies.
Searle BC; Turner M; Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteome Res; 2008 Jan; 7(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 18173222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Database Search Engines: Paradigms, Challenges and Solutions.
Verheggen K; Martens L; Berven FS; Barsnes H; Vaudel M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():147-156. PubMed ID: 27975215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of database search programs for accurate detection of neuropeptides in tandem mass spectrometry experiments.
Akhtar MN; Southey BR; Andrén PE; Sweedler JV; Rodriguez-Zas SL
J Proteome Res; 2012 Dec; 11(12):6044-55. PubMed ID: 23082934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of alternative splice variants in Aspergillus flavus through comparison of multiple tandem MS search algorithms.
Chang KY; Muddiman DC
BMC Genomics; 2011 Jul; 12():358. PubMed ID: 21745387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Optimized Informatics Pipeline for Mass Spectrometry-Based Peptidomics.
Wu C; Monroe ME; Xu Z; Slysz GW; Payne SH; Rodland KD; Liu T; Smith RD
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2015 Dec; 26(12):2002-8. PubMed ID: 26015166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new probabilistic database search algorithm for ETD spectra.
Sadygov RG; Good DM; Swaney DL; Coon JJ
J Proteome Res; 2009 Jun; 8(6):3198-205. PubMed ID: 19354237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process.
Feng XD; Li LW; Zhang JH; Zhu YP; Chang C; Shu KX; Ma J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):143. PubMed ID: 28361671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein-Level Integration Strategy of Multiengine MS Spectra Search Results for Higher Confidence and Sequence Coverage.
Zhao P; Zhong J; Liu W; Zhao J; Zhang G
J Proteome Res; 2017 Dec; 16(12):4446-4454. PubMed ID: 28965417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pepitome: evaluating improved spectral library search for identification complementarity and quality assessment.
Dasari S; Chambers MC; Martinez MA; Carpenter KL; Ham AJ; Vega-Montoto LJ; Tabb DL
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1686-95. PubMed ID: 22217208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. pValid 2: A deep learning based validation method for peptide identification in shotgun proteomics with increased discriminating power.
Zhou WJ; Wei ZH; He SM; Chi H
J Proteomics; 2022 Jan; 251():104414. PubMed ID: 34737111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
