These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809159)

  • 21. Verbing nouns and nouning verbs: Using a balanced design provides ERP evidence against "syntax-first" approaches to sentence processing.
    Fromont LA; Steinhauer K; Royle P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229169. PubMed ID: 32168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by semantic violations in visual words.
    Hu A; Gu F; Wong LLN; Tong X; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2020 Nov; 1746():147010. PubMed ID: 32663455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.
    Vitkovitch M; Batool Ghadiri T; Hersi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Apr; 195():30-38. PubMed ID: 30870743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?
    Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1019-38. PubMed ID: 12421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Did the three little pigs frighten the wolf? How deaf readers use lexical and syntactic cues to comprehend sentences.
    Gómez-Merino N; Fajardo I; Ferrer A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2021 May; 112():103908. PubMed ID: 33677384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diving into a pool or volcano? Examining the influence of sentence context and task demands on sentence reading in younger and older adults.
    Haigh P; Hanif N; de Bruin A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279555. PubMed ID: 36584104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reading aloud: the cumulative lexical interference effect.
    Mulatti C; Peressotti F; Job R; Saunders S; Coltheart M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 22623265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.
    Hyönä J; Ekholm M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152133. PubMed ID: 27003410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension.
    Hahne A; Jescheniak JD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 11275482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Semantic and syntactic processes during sentence comprehension in patients with schizophrenia: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ruchsow M; Trippel N; Groen G; Spitzer M; Kiefer M
    Schizophr Res; 2003 Nov; 64(2-3):147-56. PubMed ID: 14613679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is semantic processing impaired near the hands?
    Grossi G; Olmstead AJ; Stoudt S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Nov; 221():103443. PubMed ID: 34739901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individual word activation and word frequency effects during the processing of opaque idiomatic expressions.
    Hubers F; Cucchiarini C; Strik H; Dijkstra T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1004-1020. PubMed ID: 34507505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reading lexically without semantics: evidence from patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.
    Raymer AM; Berndt RS
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1996 Jul; 2(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 9375183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():13-22. PubMed ID: 25703606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Co-occurrence frequency evaluated with large language corpora boosts semantic priming effects.
    Brunellière A; Perre L; Tran T; Bonnotte I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 27437558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.
    Froud K; van der Lely HK
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(3):274-303. PubMed ID: 18206904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.
    Fedorenko E; Blank IA; Siegelman M; Mineroff Z
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104348. PubMed ID: 32569894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neuro-cognitive development of semantic and syntactic bootstrapping in 6- to 7.5-year-old children.
    Wagley N; Booth JR
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 241():118416. PubMed ID: 34298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.