BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809364)

  • 1. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiological Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Franssen E; Indrekvam K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 May; 48(10):688-694. PubMed ID: 36809364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Banitalebi H; Indrekvam K; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Jun; 33(6):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 38587545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg T; Haug KJ; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
    Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
    Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
    Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association between lumbar lordosis preoperatively and changes in PROMs for lumbar spinal stenosis patients 2 years after spinal surgery: radiological and clinical results from the NORDSTEN-spinal stenosis trial.
    Wänman J; Åkerstedt J; Banitalebi H; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Storheim K; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2024 May; 33(5):1950-1956. PubMed ID: 38386059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis: A survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac.
    Schizas C; Kulik G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jan; 94(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 22219255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 31365515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Brox JI; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 34797405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar Canal Stenosis: A Prospective Clinicoradiologic Analysis.
    Jain N; Acharya S; Adsul NM; Haritwal MK; Kumar M; Chahal RS; Kalra KL
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 81(5):387-391. PubMed ID: 32107754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
    Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression.
    Sigmundsson FG; Kang XP; Jönsson B; Strömqvist B
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Apr; 82(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 21434811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Herno A; Saari T; Suomalainen O; Airaksinen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 May; 24(10):1010-4. PubMed ID: 10332794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral decompression for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Zhang B; Kong Q; Yang J; Feng P; Ma J; Liu J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 33(11):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 31650756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extent of decompression and incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma among different techniques of spinal decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Leonardi MA; Zanetti M; Min K
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Dec; 26(8):407-14. PubMed ID: 22692194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of dural sac cross-sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery.
    Oba H; Takahashi J; Futatsugi T; Mogami Y; Shibata S; Ohji Y; Tanikawa H
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1088-94. PubMed ID: 23850257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.