188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809425)
1. The role of [
Basso Dias A; Mirshahvalad SA; Ortega C; Perlis N; Berlin A; van der Kwast T; Ghai S; Jhaveri K; Metser U; Haider M; Avery L; Veit-Haibach P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):2167-2176. PubMed ID: 36809425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The added value of PSMA PET/MR radiomics for prostate cancer staging.
Solari EL; Gafita A; Schachoff S; Bogdanović B; Villagrán Asiares A; Amiel T; Hui W; Rauscher I; Visvikis D; Maurer T; Schwamborn K; Mustafa M; Weber W; Navab N; Eiber M; Hatt M; Nekolla SG
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jan; 49(2):527-538. PubMed ID: 34255130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of [
Ghezzo S; Mapelli P; Bezzi C; Samanes Gajate AM; Brembilla G; Gotuzzo I; Russo T; Preza E; Cucchiara V; Ahmed N; Neri I; Mongardi S; Freschi M; Briganti A; De Cobelli F; Gianolli L; Scifo P; Picchio M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jul; 50(8):2548-2560. PubMed ID: 36933074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [
Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen BGJC; van der Voorn PJ; Jansen BHE; Smit RS; Kol SQ; Meijer D; de Bie K; Yaqub M; Windhorst BAD; Hendrikse HNH; Vis AN; Oprea-Lager DE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between
Liu Y; Dong Y; Liu J; Zhang X; Lin M; Xu B
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1329-1336. PubMed ID: 34516670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of machine learning of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted (T2W) radiomic features in PI-RADS version 2.1 category 3 lesions to predict prostate cancer diagnosis.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Thornhill R; James N; Al Kindi A; Lim AS; Schieda N
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Dec; 46(12):5647-5658. PubMed ID: 34467426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual time point imaging of staging PSMA PET/CT quantification; spread and radiomic analyses.
Aksu A; Vural Topuz Ö; Yılmaz G; Çapa Kaya G; Yılmaz B
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Mar; 36(3):310-318. PubMed ID: 34988888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts.
Grahovac M; Spielvogel CP; Krajnc D; Ecsedi B; Traub-Weidinger T; Rasul S; Kluge K; Zhao M; Li X; Hacker M; Haug A; Papp L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 May; 50(6):1607-1620. PubMed ID: 36738311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Niu S; Liu Y; Ding X; Xu Y; Yu H; Feng X; Chang X; Wang H; Li J; Gong H; Ao L; Liu J; Lin M; Wang B; Ma X; Xu B; Zhang X
Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):142-150. PubMed ID: 36281654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning-based analysis of [
Cysouw MCF; Jansen BHE; van de Brug T; Oprea-Lager DE; Pfaehler E; de Vries BM; van Moorselaar RJA; Hoekstra OS; Vis AN; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Feb; 48(2):340-349. PubMed ID: 32737518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging vs. full-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection: a radiomic features study.
Hu L; Zhou DW; Fu CX; Benkert T; Jiang CY; Li RT; Wei LM; Zhao JG
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1760-1769. PubMed ID: 32935192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delta radiomic patterns on serial bi-parametric MRI are associated with pathologic upgrading in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: preliminary findings.
Midya A; Hiremath A; Huber J; Sankar Viswanathan V; Omil-Lima D; Mahran A; Bittencourt LK; Harsha Tirumani S; Ponsky L; Shiradkar R; Madabhushi A
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1166047. PubMed ID: 37731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI in Selecting Men With Low-/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer for Focal Ablative Therapies.
Basso Dias A; Ghai S; Ortega C; Mirshahvalad SA; Perlis N; Berlin A; Avery L; Veit-Haibach P; van der Kwast T; Metser U
Clin Nucl Med; 2023 Oct; 48(10):e462-e467. PubMed ID: 37682613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lack of repeatability of radiomic features derived from PET scans: Results from a
Werner RA; Habacha B; Lütje S; Bundschuh L; Kosmala A; Essler M; Derlin T; Higuchi T; Lapa C; Buck AK; Pienta KJ; Lodge MA; Eisenberger MA; Markowski MC; Pomper MG; Gorin MA; Frey EC; Rowe SP; Bundschuh RA
Prostate; 2023 May; 83(6):547-554. PubMed ID: 36632656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically significant prostate cancer of the peripheral zone with multiparametric MRI using clinical assessment categories and radiomic features.
Bernatz S; Ackermann J; Mandel P; Kaltenbach B; Zhdanovich Y; Harter PN; Döring C; Hammerstingl R; Bodelle B; Smith K; Bucher A; Albrecht M; Rosbach N; Basten L; Yel I; Wenzel M; Bankov K; Koch I; Chun FK; Köllermann J; Wild PJ; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6757-6769. PubMed ID: 32676784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer.
Abdollahi H; Mofid B; Shiri I; Razzaghdoust A; Saadipoor A; Mahdavi A; Galandooz HM; Mahdavi SR
Radiol Med; 2019 Jun; 124(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 30607868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization and validation of 18F-DCFPyL PET radiomics-based machine learning models in intermediate- to high-risk primary prostate cancer.
Luining WI; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN; van Moorselaar RJA; Knol RJJ; Wondergem M; Boellaard R; Cysouw MCF
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293672. PubMed ID: 37943772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative parameters and radiomic features as inputs into machine learning models to predict the Gleason score of prostate cancer lesions.
Nai YH; Cheong DLH; Roy S; Kok T; Stephenson MC; Schaefferkoetter J; Totman JJ; Conti M; Eriksson L; Robins EG; Wang Z; Chua WY; Ang BWL; Singha AK; Thamboo TP; Chiong E; Reilhac A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 100():64-72. PubMed ID: 36933775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
