These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809578)

  • 1. Effective peer review audit and identification of the surgeon outlier.
    Treacy PJ; Toonson P; Blackadder H
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 May; 93(5):1176-1180. PubMed ID: 36809578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of data submitted by the treating surgeon in the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality.
    Hansen D; Hansen E; Retegan C; Morphet J; Beiles CB
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Jan; 89(1-2):16-19. PubMed ID: 30497110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Could sequential individual peer reviewed mortality audit data be used in appraisal?
    Thompson AM; Ritchie W; Stonebridge PA
    Surgeon; 2005 Aug; 3(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 16121777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality: concordance between reported and audited clinical events and delays in management in surgical mortality patients.
    Raju RS; Guy GS; Field JB; Kiroff GK; Babidge W; Maddern GJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2014 Sep; 84(9):618-23. PubMed ID: 24754257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complete clinical outcomes audit. Resource requirements and validation of the instrument.
    Hunter JG; Lyon C; Galloway K; Putterill M; van Rij A
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Jul; 13(7):699-704. PubMed ID: 10384078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: advancing surgical accountability.
    Semmens JB; Aitken RJ; Sanfilippo FM; Mukhtar SA; Haynes NS; Mountain JA
    Med J Aust; 2005 Nov; 183(10):504-8. PubMed ID: 16296962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to CUSUM: simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery.
    Bowles TA; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):587-91. PubMed ID: 17610699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audit of surgeon awareness of readmissions with venous thrombo-embolism.
    Swan J; Spigelman AD
    Intern Med J; 2003 Dec; 33(12):578-80. PubMed ID: 14656231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systemic predictors of adverse events in a national surgical mortality audit: analysis of peer-review data from Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality.
    Turner RC; Simpson S; Bhalerao M
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Nov; 89(11):1398-1403. PubMed ID: 31480102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping changes in surgical mortality over 9 years by peer review audit.
    Thompson AM; Ashraf Z; Burton H; Stonebridge PA
    Br J Surg; 2005 Nov; 92(11):1449-52. PubMed ID: 15997442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical care for the aged: a retrospective cross-sectional study of a national surgical mortality audit.
    Allen J; North JB; Wysocki AP; Ware RS; Rey-Conde T
    BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(5):e006981. PubMed ID: 26009574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers.
    Rey-Conde T; Wysocki AP; North JB; Allen J; Ware RS; Watters DA
    Am J Surg; 2016 Oct; 212(4):748-754. PubMed ID: 27090563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association Between Surgeon Technical Skills and Patient Outcomes.
    Stulberg JJ; Huang R; Kreutzer L; Ban K; Champagne BJ; Steele SR; Johnson JK; Holl JL; Greenberg CC; Bilimoria KY
    JAMA Surg; 2020 Oct; 155(10):960-968. PubMed ID: 32838425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can the national surgical quality improvement program provide surgeon-specific outcomes?
    Kuhnen AH; Marcello PW; Roberts PL; Read TE; Schoetz DJ; Rusin LC; Hall JF; Ricciardi R
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Feb; 58(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 25585085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of the British Association of Urological Surgeons female stress urinary incontinence procedures outcomes audit 2014-2017.
    Cashman S; Biers S; Greenwell T; Harding C; Morley R; Cooper D; Fowler S; Thiruchelvam N;
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 30222915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-mortem general surgeon reflection on decision-making: a mixed-methods study of mortality audit data.
    Cattanach DE; Wysocki AP; Ray-Conde T; Nankivell C; Allen J; North JB
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Oct; 88(10):993-997. PubMed ID: 30159977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How participation in surgical mortality audit impacts surgical practice.
    Lui CW; Boyle FM; Wysocki AP; Baker P; D'Souza A; Faint S; Rey-Conde T; North JB
    BMC Surg; 2017 Apr; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28424055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of Surgeon-Delivered Audit and Feedback Incorporating Peer Surgical Coaching to Reduce Fistula Incidence following Cleft Palate Repair: A Pilot Trial.
    Sitzman TJ; Tse RW; Allori AC; Fisher DM; Samson TD; Beals SP; Matic DB; Marcus JR; Grossoehme DH; Britto MT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jul; 146(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 32590658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient mortality after surgery on the surgeon's birthday: observational study.
    Kato H; Jena AB; Tsugawa Y
    BMJ; 2020 Dec; 371():m4381. PubMed ID: 34913872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.