136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809651)
1. GalaxyDock2-HEME: Protein-ligand docking for heme proteins.
Lee C; Yang J; Kwon S; Seok C
J Comput Chem; 2023 May; 44(14):1369-1380. PubMed ID: 36809651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Docking to heme proteins.
Röhrig UF; Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
J Comput Chem; 2009 Nov; 30(14):2305-15. PubMed ID: 19288474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GalaxyDock2: protein-ligand docking using beta-complex and global optimization.
Shin WH; Kim JK; Kim DS; Seok C
J Comput Chem; 2013 Nov; 34(30):2647-56. PubMed ID: 24108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Good Are Current Docking Programs at Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking? A Comprehensive Evaluation.
Jiang D; Zhao H; Du H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wu J; Hsieh CY; Hou T
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(16):5633-5647. PubMed ID: 37480347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GalaxyDock3: Protein-ligand docking that considers the full ligand conformational flexibility.
Yang J; Baek M; Seok C
J Comput Chem; 2019 Dec; 40(31):2739-2748. PubMed ID: 31423613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advances in Docking.
Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Assessment of Seven Docking Programs on a Nonredundant Metalloprotein Subset of the PDBbind Refined.
Çınaroğlu SS; Timuçin E
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3846-3859. PubMed ID: 31460757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FWAVina: A novel optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking based on the fireworks algorithm.
Li J; Song Y; Li F; Zhang H; Liu W
Comput Biol Chem; 2020 Oct; 88():107363. PubMed ID: 32861160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
Gaillard T
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HCovDock: an efficient docking method for modeling covalent protein-ligand interactions.
Wu Q; Huang SY
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36573474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On-the-Fly QM/MM Docking with Attracting Cavities.
Chaskar P; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 27983849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-Step Covalent Docking with Attracting Cavities.
Goullieux M; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7847-7859. PubMed ID: 38049143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Assessment of Pose Prediction Accuracy in RNA-Ligand Docking.
Agarwal R; T RR; Smith JC
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(23):7444-7452. PubMed ID: 37972310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autodock Vina Adopts More Accurate Binding Poses but Autodock4 Forms Better Binding Affinity.
Nguyen NT; Nguyen TH; Pham TNH; Huy NT; Bay MV; Pham MQ; Nam PC; Vu VV; Ngo ST
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 31887035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
