These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809774)

  • 21. Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
    Barda G; Ganer Herman H; Sagiv R; Bar J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Oct; 31(20):2777-2781. PubMed ID: 28764579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).
    Middleton P; Shepherd E; Flenady V; McBain RD; Crowther CA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jan; 1(1):CD005302. PubMed ID: 28050900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Kerr RS; Kumar N; Williams MJ; Cuthbert A; Aflaifel N; Haas DM; Weeks AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(6):CD014484. PubMed ID: 34155622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.
    Vogel JP; Osoti AO; Kelly AJ; Livio S; Norman JE; Alfirevic Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD007701. PubMed ID: 28901007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 11777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oral versus vaginal prostaglandin for labor induction.
    Thorbiörnson A; Vladic T; Stjernholm YV
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(7):789-792. PubMed ID: 27186795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Stephenson ML; Wing DA
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 26601733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    West HM; Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD009792. PubMed ID: 28599068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Ten Eikelder ML; van Pampus MG; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van der Post JA; van der Salm P; Scheepers HC; Schuitemaker N; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 23870188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
    Kelly AJ; Malik S; Smith L; Kavanagh J; Thomas J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD003101. PubMed ID: 19821301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Alfirevic Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (4):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11034716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.