These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809800)

  • 1. HIBLUP: an integration of statistical models on the BLUP framework for efficient genetic evaluation using big genomic data.
    Yin L; Zhang H; Tang Z; Yin D; Fu Y; Yuan X; Li X; Liu X; Zhao S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 May; 51(8):3501-3512. PubMed ID: 36809800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
    Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GenoMatrix: A Software Package for Pedigree-Based and Genomic Prediction Analyses on Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Jul; 107(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 27025440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OCMA: Fast, Memory-Efficient Factorization of Prohibitively Large Relationship Matrices.
    Xiong Z; Zhang Q; Platt A; Liao W; Shi X; de Los Campos G; Long Q
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Jan; 9(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 30482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.
    Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):36. PubMed ID: 28359261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
    Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large-scale genomic prediction using singular value decomposition of the genotype matrix.
    Ødegård J; Indahl U; Strandén I; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Feb; 50(1):6. PubMed ID: 29490611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new tool called DISSECT for analysing large genomic data sets using a Big Data approach.
    Canela-Xandri O; Law A; Gray A; Woolliams JA; Tenesa A
    Nat Commun; 2015 Dec; 6():10162. PubMed ID: 26657010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.
    Misztal I; Legarra A; Aguilar I
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3943-52. PubMed ID: 24679933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GAPIT Version 3: Boosting Power and Accuracy for Genomic Association and Prediction.
    Wang J; Zhang Z
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 34492338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical note: Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):2027-2031. PubMed ID: 33309381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient.
    Masuda Y; Misztal I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DA; Fragomeni BO; Aguilar I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 28177357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BESSiE: a software for linear model BLUP and Bayesian MCMC analysis of large-scale genomic data.
    Boerner V; Tier B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):63. PubMed ID: 27590176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical implementation of genetic groups in single-step genomic evaluations with Woodbury matrix identity-based genomic relationship inverse.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Sep; 104(9):10049-10058. PubMed ID: 34099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and application of an efficient genomic mating method to maximize the production performances of three-way crossbred pigs.
    Tang Z; Yin L; Yin D; Zhang H; Fu Y; Zhou G; Zhao Y; Wang Z; Liu X; Li X; Zhao S
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36575830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.
    Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):50. PubMed ID: 25253441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5833-50. PubMed ID: 25022678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.