These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36809800)

  • 21. A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.
    Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):50. PubMed ID: 25253441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction.
    Legarra A; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4629-45. PubMed ID: 22818478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5833-50. PubMed ID: 25022678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ICGRM: integrative construction of genomic relationship matrix combining multiple genomic regions for big dataset.
    Jiang D; Xin C; Ye J; Yuan Y; Fang M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):731. PubMed ID: 31878869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical note: Equivalent genomic models with a residual polygenic effect.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2016-2025. PubMed ID: 26723117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extension of the reduced animal model to single-step methods.
    Nilforooshan MA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36069946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breeding and Genetics Symposium: really big data: processing and analysis of very large data sets.
    Cole JB; Newman S; Foertter F; Aguilar I; Coffey M
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):723-33. PubMed ID: 22100598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computing strategies for multi-population genomic evaluation.
    Legarra A; González-Diéguez D; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Feb; 54(1):10. PubMed ID: 35114933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A fast indirect method to compute functions of genomic relationships concerning genotyped and ungenotyped individuals, for diversity management.
    Colleau JJ; Palhière I; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):87. PubMed ID: 29191178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
    Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix.
    Zhang Z; Liu J; Ding X; Bijma P; de Koning DJ; Zhang Q
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20844593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Forneris NS; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jul; 54(1):52. PubMed ID: 35842585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inexpensive Computation of the Inverse of the Genomic Relationship Matrix in Populations with Small Effective Population Size.
    Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 26584903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. BGData - A Suite of R Packages for Genomic Analysis with Big Data.
    Grueneberg A; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 30894453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimisation of the core subset for the APY approximation of genomic relationships.
    Pocrnic I; Lindgren F; Tolhurst D; Herring WO; Gorjanc G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Nov; 54(1):76. PubMed ID: 36418945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection.
    Misztal I; Legarra A
    Animal; 2017 May; 11(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 27869042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
    Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.