These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36811176)

  • 1. Bayesian hierarchical response time modelling-A tutorial.
    Koenig C; Becker B; Ulitzsch E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):623-645. PubMed ID: 36811176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 25109494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Lognormal Race: A Cognitive-Process Model of Choice and Latency with Desirable Psychometric Properties.
    Rouder JN; Province JM; Morey RD; Gomez P; Heathcote A
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):491-513. PubMed ID: 24522340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling Dependence Structures for Response Times in a Bayesian Framework.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):649-672. PubMed ID: 31098935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of hierarchical response time models.
    Farrell S; Ludwig CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1209-17. PubMed ID: 19001592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions.
    Annis J; Miller BJ; Palmeri TJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):863-886. PubMed ID: 27287444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilevel modelling of medical data.
    Goldstein H; Browne W; Rasbash J
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3291-315. PubMed ID: 12375305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.
    Gu X; Mulder J; Hoijtink H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):229-261. PubMed ID: 28857129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology.
    Plieninger H; Heck DW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):633-654. PubMed ID: 29843531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic models of choice.
    Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item selection via Bayesian IRT models.
    Arima S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 25327293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical approximate Bayesian computation.
    Turner BM; Van Zandt T
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):185-209. PubMed ID: 24297436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tutorial on cognitive modeling for cognitive aging research.
    Greene NR; Rhodes S
    Psychol Aging; 2022 Feb; 37(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 35113612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.