200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36811671)
1. Does formative assessment help students to acquire prescribing skills?
Kalfsvel LS; Peeters LEJ; Hoek K; Bethlehem C; van der Sijs IH; van der Kuy PHM; van den Broek WW; Versmissen J; van Rosse F
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2023 Apr; 79(4):533-540. PubMed ID: 36811671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
Mitra NK; Barua A
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How would final-year medical students perform if their skill-based prescription assessment was real life?
Kalfsvel L; Hoek K; Bethlehem C; van der Kuy H; van den Broek WW; Versmissen J; van Rosse F
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2022 Dec; 88(12):5202-5217. PubMed ID: 35653185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An investigation of preclinical medical students' preference for summative or formative assessment for physiology learning.
Rae MG; Abdulla MH
Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Sep; 47(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 37141432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of formative assessment in pathophysiology education from students' perspective: a questionnaire study.
Cong X; Zhang Y; Xu H; Liu LM; Zheng M; Xiang RL; Wang JY; Jia S; Cai JY; Liu C; Wu LL
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Dec; 44(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 33155832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy.
Svensäter G; Rohlin M
Eur J Dent Educ; 2023 Feb; 27(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 35132742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) as formative assessment in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cohort study.
Deane RP; Joyce P; Murphy DJ
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26453191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Twelve tips for facilitating medical students prescribing learning on clinical placement.
Linton KD; Murdoch-Eaton D
Med Teach; 2020 Oct; 42(10):1134-1139. PubMed ID: 32065546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motivational simulated teaching of clinical skills using formative assessment methods for medical undergraduate students: between-group evaluation of a simulated course in a Chinese medical college.
Yang W; Ruan M; Gong J; Peng M; Wang Z; Xia W; Liu X; Yang G
BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e069782. PubMed ID: 37751955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the evaluation of formative assessment at two medical faculties with different conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback.
Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Karay Y; Arias J; Gehlhar K; Zupanic M
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc41. PubMed ID: 32685669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Formative assessment in undergraduate medical education: concept, implementation and hurdles.
Rauf A; Shamim MS; Aly SM; Chundrigar T; Alam SN
J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 24605718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of two types of formative assessment in predicting performance of first-year medical students.
Krasne S; Wimmers PF; Relan A; Drake TA
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 16729243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The validity of Engagement and Feedback Assessments (EFAs): identifying students at risk of failing.
Kemp PR; Bradshaw JM; Pandya B; Davies D; Morrell MJ; Sam AH
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Nov; 23(1):866. PubMed ID: 37968656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.
Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):293. PubMed ID: 27846882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A qualitative study examining the critical differences in the experience of and response to formative feedback by undergraduate medical students in Japan and the UK.
Kozato A; Shikino K; Matsuyama Y; Hayashi M; Kondo S; Uchida S; Stanyon M; Ito S
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jun; 23(1):408. PubMed ID: 37277728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?
Sinclair HK; Cleland JA
Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 17518838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of a summative national prescribing assessment and curriculum type on the development of the prescribing competence of junior doctors.
Donker EM; Osmani H; Brinkman DJ; van Rosse F; Janssen B; Knol W; Dumont G; Jorens PG; Dupont A; Christiaens T; van Smeden J; de Waard-Siebinga I; Peeters LEJ; Goorden R; Hessel M; Lissenberg-Witte BI; Richir MC; van Agtmael MA; Kramers C; Tichelaar J;
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2023 Dec; 79(12):1613-1621. PubMed ID: 37737911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.
Mostyn A; Meade O; Lymn JS
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Nov; 12():113. PubMed ID: 23148762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
