232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36812699)
21. Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up.
Karanasios E; Caglic I; Zawaideh JP; Barrett T
Br J Radiol; 2022 May; 95(1133):20211372. PubMed ID: 35179971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the PI-RADS 2.1 scoring system to PI-RADS 2.0: Impact on diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement.
Hötker AM; Blüthgen C; Rupp NJ; Schneider AF; Eberli D; Donati OF
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239975. PubMed ID: 33017413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality assessment of prostate MRI by PI-QUAL score: Inter-reader agreement and impact on prostate cancer local staging at 3 Tesla.
Coelho FMA; Amaral LTW; Mitsutake LKN; Mussi TC; Baroni RH
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110921. PubMed ID: 37336037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving reader accuracy and specificity with the addition of hybrid multidimensional-MRI to multiparametric-MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers.
Lee G; Chatterjee A; Harmath C; Karademir I; Engelmann R; Yousuf A; Islam S; Karczmar G; Oto A; Giurcanu M; Antic T; Eggener S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Oct; 48(10):3216-3228. PubMed ID: 37358605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Structured reporting in radiologic education - Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies.
Garmer M; Karpienski J; Groenemeyer DH; Wagener B; Kamper L; Haage P
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210458. PubMed ID: 34914538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantib Prostate Compared to an Expert Radiologist for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on mpMRI: A Single-Center Preliminary Study.
Faiella E; Vertulli D; Esperto F; Cordelli E; Soda P; Muraca RM; Moramarco LP; Grasso RF; Beomonte Zobel B; Santucci D
Tomography; 2022 Aug; 8(4):2010-2019. PubMed ID: 36006066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program.
Giganti F; Lindner S; Piper JW; Kasivisvanathan V; Emberton M; Moore CM; Allen C
Eur Radiol Exp; 2021 Nov; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 34738219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee CH; Vellayappan B; Tan CH
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210509. PubMed ID: 34520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Second Opinion May Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: Time to Improve Radiologists' Training Program?
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Musi G; Catellani M; Alessi S; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Serino A; Conti A; Pricolo P; Nazzani S; Mirone V; Matei DV; Montanari E; de Cobelli O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Apr; 17(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 30527286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Becker AS; Cornelius A; Reiner CS; Stocker D; Ulbrich EJ; Barth BK; Mortezavi A; Eberli D; Donati OF
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():58-63. PubMed ID: 28941761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang D; Zhang X; Bai X; Yan W; Zhou Y; Zhou Z; Xiao Y; Jin Z; Sun H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4133-4141. PubMed ID: 32918577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate MR image quality of apparent diffusion coefficient maps versus fractional intracellular volume maps from VERDICT MRI using the PI-QUAL score and a dedicated Likert scale for artefacts.
Singh S; Giganti F; Dickinson L; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Johnston EW; Moore CM; Freeman A; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111109. PubMed ID: 37769532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
