129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36814030)
1. Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fang X; Li J; Wang L; Liu L; Lv W; Tang Z; Gao D
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3200-3210. PubMed ID: 36814030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial loading lumbar magnetic resonance imaging with a new device in asymptomatic individuals.
Fang X; Li J; Liu L; Zhang Y; Tang Z; Zhang J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jan; 13(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36620162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar spinal stenosis: an MRI study using a new axial loading device.
Fang X; Cui M; Wang Y; Liu L; Lv W; Ye H; Liu G
Skeletal Radiol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38849534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-retest repeatability of lumbar sagittal alignment and disc height measurements with or without axial loading: a computed tomography study.
Hioki A; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K; Inoue N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Apr; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 21430497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.
Kim YK; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Kang HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1342-7. PubMed ID: 23797506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Axial loading during supine MRI for improved assessment of lumbar spine: comparison with standing MRI.
Charoensuk J; Laothamatas J; Sungkarat W; Worapruekjaru L; Hooncharoen B; Chousangsuntorn K
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jan; 64(1):217-227. PubMed ID: 34939453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbosacral spinal compression device with the use of a cushion back support in supine MRI.
Sungkarat W; Laothamatas J; Worapruekjaru L; Hooncharoen B; Charoensuk J; Chousangsuntorn K
Acta Radiol; 2021 Aug; 62(8):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32854529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.
Hjaltadottir H; Hebelka H; Molinder C; Brisby H; Baranto A
Eur Spine J; 2020 Jan; 29(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 31584119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional Supine MRI With a Lumbar Pillow-An Alternative to Weight-bearing MRI for Diagnosing Spinal Stenosis?: A Cross-sectional Study.
Hansen BB; Hansen P; Grindsted J; Rasti Z; Bliddal H; Riis RGC; Boesen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(9):662-669. PubMed ID: 27584675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine with axial loading: a review of 120 cases.
Kinder A; Filho FP; Ribeiro E; Domingues RC; Domingues RC; Marchiori E; Gasparetto E
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e561-4. PubMed ID: 21741192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: does age matter?
Kitab S; Habboub G; Abdulkareem SB; Alimidhatti MB; Benzel E
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 31100722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic effects of axial loading on the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected spinal stenosis.
Wang YC; Jeng CM; Wu CY; Chang HY; Huang YC; Wang YJ; Wang PC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Apr; 107(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 18445548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is spinal stenosis assessment dependent on slice orientation? A magnetic resonance imaging study.
Henderson L; Kulik G; Richarme D; Theumann N; Schizas C
Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S760-4. PubMed ID: 21656052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: an MRI-based multivariate analysis of findings in 709 patients throughout the 16- to 82-year age spectrum.
Kitab S; Lee BS; Benzel EC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 29(6):654-660. PubMed ID: 30215592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Axial loading during MRI induces significant T2 value changes in vertebral endplates-a feasibility study on patients with low back pain.
Hebelka H; Miron A; Kasperska I; Brisby H; Lagerstrand K
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jan; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 29378613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Axial Loading on the Lumbar Spine.
Sehic A; Julardzija F; Bulja D; Jusufbegovic M; Konjo H; Sefo H; Zubovic S
Acta Inform Med; 2022 Dec; 30(4):312-317. PubMed ID: 36467327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
