These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36814336)

  • 1. A randomised open-label trial to assess outpatient induction of labour (HOMEIND) and compare efficacy of Propess vs Dilapan-S® for induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation in normal risk nulliparous women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Nicholson SM; Smith O; Hatt S; Molphy Z; Dicker P; Flood K; Malone F
    Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):135. PubMed ID: 36814336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective pilot study of Dilapan-S compared with Propess for induction of labour at 41+ weeks in nulliparous pregnancy.
    Crosby DA; O'Reilly C; McHale H; McAuliffe FM; Mahony R
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Aug; 187(3):693-699. PubMed ID: 29270855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) or dinoprostone vaginal inserts (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour: A UK cost-consequence model.
    Walker KF; Zaher S; Torrejon Torres R; Saunders SJ; Saunders R; Gupta JK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Nov; 278():72-76. PubMed ID: 36116393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between labor induction with only Dilapan-S and a combination of mifepristone and Dilapan-S in nulliparous women: a prospective pilot study.
    Baev OR; Babich DA; Prikhodko AM; Tysyachniy OV; Sukhikh GT
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(17):2832-2837. PubMed ID: 31570028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study.
    Gupta J; Chodankar R; Baev O; Bahlmann F; Brega E; Gala A; Hellmeyer L; Hruban L; Maier J; Mehta P; Murthy A; Ritter M; Saad A; Shmakov R; Suneja A; Zahumensky J; Gdovinova D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():70-75. PubMed ID: 30107363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Gupta JK; Maher A; Stubbs C; Brocklehurst P; Daniels JP; Hardy P;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jul; 4(4):100628. PubMed ID: 35358740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess®), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (RE-DINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Coste Mazeau P; Hessas M; Martin R; Eyraud JL; Margueritte F; Aubard Y; Sallee C; Sire F; Gauthier T
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 31915047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial).
    Saad AF; Villarreal J; Eid J; Spencer N; Ellis V; Hankins GD; Saade GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):275.e1-275.e9. PubMed ID: 30790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016069. PubMed ID: 28912192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the efficacy of dilapan with extra-amniotic saline infusion and oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in term pregnancies.
    Kashanian M; Eshraghi N; Sheikhansari N; Eshraghi N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5616-5620. PubMed ID: 33622151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propess versus prostin for induction of labour in term primiparous women.
    Hung CH; Chen HY; Kang J; Tai YY; Lin SY; Lee CN
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Aug; 122(8):785-789. PubMed ID: 36907791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
    Yamaguchi M; Takakura S; Enomoto N; Teishikata Y; Kitamura A; Maki S; Tanaka K; Maezawa T; Tanaka H; Ikeda T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Dec; 47(12):4256-4262. PubMed ID: 34545652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
    PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.
    Koenigbauer JT; Schalinski E; Jarchau U; Gauger U; Brandt K; Klaucke S; Scharf JP; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 34333894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes.
    Kelly AJ; Alfirevic Z; Ghosh A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD007372. PubMed ID: 24222365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F).
    Bhide A; Sedgwick P; Barrett B; Cupples G; Coates R; Goode R; Linton S; McCourt C
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2020; 6():113. PubMed ID: 32821419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study).
    Wilkinson C; Bryce R; Adelson P; Turnbull D
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 24824157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of pharmacological and mechanical cervical priming methods for induction of labour and their applicability for outpatient management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
    Khan H; Buaki-Sogo MA; Barlow P; Vardanyan R; Zatorska A; Miller G; Arjomandi Rad A; Malawana J; Shah NM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():80-92. PubMed ID: 37300982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outpatient cervical ripening in a district general hospital: a five-year retrospective cohort study.
    Barnfield L; Neale E; Reynolds S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):301-304. PubMed ID: 28920504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.