These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36817564)

  • 1. Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups.
    Orbán-Mihálykó É; Mihálykó C; Gyarmati L
    Cent Eur J Oper Res; 2023 Feb; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 36817564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The wisdom of the crowd with partial rankings: A Bayesian approach implementing the Thurstone model in JAGS.
    Montgomery LE; Bradford N; Lee MD
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Oct; 56(7):8091-8104. PubMed ID: 39080123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: methodological aspects and ranking tasks.
    Schmidt K; Babac A; Pauer F; Damm K; von der Schulenburg JM
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 27844450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiverse analysis and the Bradley-Terry model: A proposed approach for evaluating palatability and preference.
    Pape AE; Scuderi RA; Green J; Ballard CS
    JDS Commun; 2024 Sep; 5(5):516-520. PubMed ID: 39310817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An estimation of generalized bradley-terry models based on the em algorithm.
    Fujimoto Y; Hino H; Murata N
    Neural Comput; 2011 Jun; 23(6):1623-59. PubMed ID: 21395441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to visualize and test the linearity assumption of the Bradley-Terry class of models.
    Shev A; Hsieh F; Beisner B; McCowan B
    Anim Behav; 2012 Dec; 84(6):1523-1531. PubMed ID: 24052665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Bradley-Terry Regression Trunk approach for Modeling Preference Data with Small Trees.
    Baldassarre A; Dusseldorp E; D'Ambrosio A; Rooij M; Conversano C
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1443-1465. PubMed ID: 36057077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exploratory factor model for ordinal paired comparison indicators.
    Pritikin JN
    Heliyon; 2020 Sep; 6(9):e04821. PubMed ID: 32984579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian analysis of paired-comparison sound quality ratings.
    Leijon A; Dahlquist M; Smeds K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3174. PubMed ID: 31795670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian approach to time-varying latent strengths in pairwise comparisons.
    Krese B; Štrumbelj E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251945. PubMed ID: 34014996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of two models for scaling health indicators.
    Kind P
    Int J Epidemiol; 1982 Sep; 11(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 7129741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Recursive Partitioning Method for the Prediction of Preference Rankings Based Upon Kemeny Distances.
    D'Ambrosio A; Heiser WJ
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):774-94. PubMed ID: 27370072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mutual point-winning probabilities (MPW): a new performance measure for table tennis.
    Ley C; Dominicy Y; Bruneel W
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Dec; 36(23):2684-2690. PubMed ID: 29130812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Heterogeneity in Students' Visual Judgment: Model-Based Partitioning of Image Rankings.
    Tallon M; Greenlee MW; Wagner E; Rakoczy K; Wiedermann W; Frick U
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():881558. PubMed ID: 36118447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid pairwise likelihood analysis of animal behavior experiments.
    Cattelan M; Varin C
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 24117216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systemic testing on Bradley-Terry model against nonlinear ranking hierarchy.
    Shev A; Fujii K; Hsieh F; McCowan B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115367. PubMed ID: 25531899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A pilot study of the use of the analytic hierarchy process for the selection of surgery residents.
    Weingarten MS; Erlich F; Nydick RL; Liberatore MJ
    Acad Med; 1997 May; 72(5):400-2. PubMed ID: 9159591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thurstone scaling revealed systematic health-state valuation differences between patients with dementia and proxies.
    Arons AM; Krabbe PF; Schölzel-Dorenbos CJ; van der Wilt GJ; Olde Rikkert MG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 65(8):897-905. PubMed ID: 22652351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects in Comparative Judgments.
    Wiedermann W; Frick U; Merkle EC
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):444-454. PubMed ID: 33687608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SPECTRAL METHOD AND REGULARIZED MLE ARE BOTH OPTIMAL FOR TOP-
    Chen Y; Fan J; Ma C; Wang K
    Ann Stat; 2019; 47(4):2204-2235. PubMed ID: 31598016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.