166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36817798)
1. Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained using quantitative SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Lin L; Zheng R; Geng J; Wang X; Li M; Fan R; Zheng Y; Yang K
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1119214. PubMed ID: 36817798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardized uptake values of
Qi N; Meng Q; You Z; Chen H; Shou Y; Zhao J
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):39. PubMed ID: 33639883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum standardized uptake value from quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating metastatic and degenerative joint disease of the spine in prostate cancer patients.
Mohd Rohani MF; Mat Nawi N; Shamim SE; Wan Sohaimi WF; Wan Zainon WMN; Musarudin M; Said MA; Hashim H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 34(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 31612417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases.
Tabotta F; Jreige M; Schaefer N; Becce F; Prior JO; Nicod Lalonde M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):619. PubMed ID: 31878904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic value of quantitative bone SPECT/CT in solitary undetermined bone lesions.
Du F; Wumener X; Zhang Y; Liu M; Li T; Huang S; Zhang M; Wu R; Liang Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1205379. PubMed ID: 38023132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of skeletal standardized uptake values obtained by quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography in differential diagnosis of bone metastases.
Zhang Y; Li B; Yu H; Song J; Zhou Y; Shi H
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jan; 42(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 33044406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained by quantitative SPECT/CT as an osteoblastic biomarker for the discrimination of active bone metastasis in prostate cancer.
Kuji I; Yamane T; Seto A; Yasumizu Y; Shirotake S; Oyama M
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2017; 1(1):2. PubMed ID: 29782587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative [
Tanaka K; Norikane T; Mitamura K; Yamamoto Y; Maeda Y; Fujimoto K; Takami Y; Ishimura M; Arai-Okuda H; Tohi Y; Kudomi N; Sugimoto M; Nishiyama Y
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Dec; 9(1):83. PubMed ID: 36469149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative
Coskun N; Cagdas B; Yildirim N
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(2):132-137. PubMed ID: 35913859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of standardized uptake values between
Arvola S; Jambor I; Kuisma A; Kemppainen J; Kajander S; Seppänen M; Noponen T
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jan; 9(1):6. PubMed ID: 30680469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardized Uptake Value from Semiquantitative Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Normal Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebrae of Breast Cancer Patients.
Rohani MFM; Yonan SNM; Tagiling N; Zainon WMNW; Udin Y; Nawi NM
Asian Spine J; 2020 Oct; 14(5):629-638. PubMed ID: 32213791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective study of SPECT/CT scans using SUV measurement of the normal pelvis with Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate.
Wang R; Duan X; Shen C; Han D; Ma J; Wu H; Xu X; Qin T; Fan Q; Zhang Z; Shi W; Guo Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(6):895-908. PubMed ID: 30103368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints.
An YS; Park DY; Min BH; Lee SJ; Yoon JK
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33771130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semiquantitative assessment of osteoblastic, osteolytic, and mixed lytic-sclerotic bone lesions on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy.
Gurkan G; Sarikaya I; Sarikaya A
World J Nucl Med; 2019; 18(2):132-136. PubMed ID: 31040743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification evaluation of
Huang K; Feng Y; Liu D; Liang W; Li L
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 31768820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum standardized uptake value of foot SPECT/CT using Tc-99m HDP in patients with accessory navicular bone as a predictor of surgical treatment.
Bae S; Kang Y; Song YS; Lee WW;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(2):e14022. PubMed ID: 30633193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of
Oya T; Ichikawa Y; Nakamura S; Tomita Y; Sasaki T; Inoue T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Jun; 37(6):360-370. PubMed ID: 36947324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison of
Zhang Y; Lin Z; Li T; Wei Y; Yu M; Ye L; Cai Y; Yang S; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Chen W
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15993. PubMed ID: 36163353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
