184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36819334)
1. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a CAD/CAM zirconia-based ceramic crown system.
Baig MR; Al-Tarakemah Y; Kasim NHA; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):319–329. PubMed ID: 33616567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Effect of No Finish Line, Heavy Chamfer, and Shoulder Marginal Designs on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia (Cercon) Ceramic Restoration: An In Vitro Study.
Gavara SG; Jain S; Gupta H; Sharma S; Panwar P; Momin MS
Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e39009. PubMed ID: 37323304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Finish Line Design on the Fit Accuracy of CAD/CAM Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic-Network Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Embaireeg M
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 34960861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different marginal finish line configurations.
Faruqi S; Ganji KK; Bandela V; Nagarajappa AK; Mohamed RN; Ahmed MA; Farhan M; Alwakid WN; Al-Hammad KAS; Alam MK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 34668306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns.
Comlekoglu M; Dundar M; Ozcan M; Gungor M; Gokce B; Artunc C
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 19830974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of porcelain firing and type of finish line on the marginal fit of zirconia copings.
Vojdani M; Safari A; Mohaghegh M; Pardis S; Mahdavi F
J Dent (Shiraz); 2015 Jun; 16(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 26046107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate CAD-CAM crowns: An in vitro comparison of the silicone replica technique, direct view, and 3-dimensional superimposition analysis.
El-Ashkar A; Taymour M; El-Tannir A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):769-776. PubMed ID: 34479719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of finish line variants on marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceramic optimized polymer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
Cho L; Choi J; Yi YJ; Park CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 15211298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown.
Ji MK; Park JH; Park SW; Yun KD; Oh GJ; Lim HP
J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 7(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 26330973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
