These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36820562)
1. Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Young JR; Mugu VK; Johnson GB; Ehman EC; Packard AT; Homb AC; Nathan MA; Thanarajasingam G; Kemp BJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32665. PubMed ID: 36820562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes of [ Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [ Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The variation of quantitative parameters and Deauville scores with different reconstruction algorithms in FDG PET/CT imaging of lymphoma patients. Genc M; Yildirim N; Coskun N; Ozdemir E; Turkolmez S Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 37524200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [ Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics. Vallot D; Caselles O; Chaltiel L; Fernandez A; Gabiache E; Dierickx L; Zerdoud S; Bauriaud M; Courbon F Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):979-984. PubMed ID: 29045338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size. Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases? Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights. Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma. Wang Y; Lin L; Quan W; Li J; Li W Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Mar; 43(3):284-291. PubMed ID: 34864809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood]. Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]