These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36820623)

  • 1. Revisiting the effect of text complexity on Continuous Discourse Tracking using synthetic speech: Old tricks with new dogs.
    Busch CE; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell C; Morris DJ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2024 Mar; 38(2):172-183. PubMed ID: 36820623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Speech With and Without Contralateral Hearing: Implications for Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation.
    Chavant M; Hervais-Adelman A; Macherey O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 64(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 33267729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the number of channels and speech-to-noise ratio on rate of connected discourse tracking through a simulated cochlear implant speech processor.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S; Wilkinson L
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 11605950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.
    Fathima H; Bhat JS; Pitchaimuthu AN
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 36695909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
    Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preimplant measures of preverbal communicative behavior as predictors of cochlear implant outcomes in children.
    Tait M; Lutman ME; Robinson K
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 10708070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacological enhancement of aural habilitation in adult cochlear implant users.
    Tobey EA; Devous MD; Buckley K; Overson G; Harris T; Ringe W; Martinez-Verhoff J
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4 Suppl):45S-56S. PubMed ID: 16082267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Auditory Environment Predict Speech Perception Outcomes in Elderly Cochlear Implant Patients?
    Chow K; Kaul VF; Levine-Madoff J; Wanna GB; Cosetti MK
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(5):378-386. PubMed ID: 33951634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.
    Drouin JR; Theodore RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):981. PubMed ID: 36050170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spectral smearing on speech understanding and masking release in simulated bilateral cochlear implants.
    Cychosz M; Xu K; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0287728. PubMed ID: 37917727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Speech Performance in Bimodal versus Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sturm JJ; Kuhlmey M; Alexiades G; Hoffman R; Kim AH
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Apr; 131(4):E1322-E1327. PubMed ID: 32876332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.