These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36820779)

  • 1. Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool.
    Martimbianco ALC; Sá KMM; Santos GM; Santos EM; Pacheco RL; Riera R
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(3):469-472. PubMed ID: 36820779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
    Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.
    Babic A; Tokalic R; Amílcar Silva Cunha J; Novak I; Suto J; Vidak M; Miosic I; Vuka I; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30953448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research.
    Sofi-Mahmudi A; Iranparvar P; Shakiba M; Shamsoddin E; Mohammad-Rahimi H; Naseri S; Motie P; Tovani-Palone MR; Mesgarpour B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta-research study.
    Babić A; Barcot O; Visković T; Šarić F; Kirkovski A; Barun I; Križanac Z; Ananda RA; Fuentes Barreiro YV; Malih N; Dimcea DA; Ordulj J; Weerasekara I; Spezia M; Žuljević MF; Šuto J; Tancredi L; Pijuk A; Sammali S; Iascone V; von Groote T; Poklepović Peričić T; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):430-440. PubMed ID: 38262609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
    Craig SS; Dalziel SR; Powell CV; Graudins A; Babl FE; Lunny C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD012977. PubMed ID: 32767571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review.
    Igelström E; Campbell M; Craig P; Katikireddi SV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():22-32. PubMed ID: 34437948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
    Jørgensen L; Paludan-Müller AS; Laursen DR; Savović J; Boutron I; Sterne JA; Higgins JP; Hróbjartsson A
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():80. PubMed ID: 27160280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
    Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance.
    Propadalo I; Tranfic M; Vuka I; Barcot O; Pericic TP; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():10-17. PubMed ID: 30312657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochrane Centralised Search Service showed high sensitivity identifying randomized controlled trials: A retrospective analysis.
    Noel-Storr AH; Dooley G; Wisniewski S; Glanville J; Thomas J; Cox S; Featherstone R; Foxlee R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():142-150. PubMed ID: 32798713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
    Liu Z; Dumville JC; Norman G; Westby MJ; Blazeby J; McFarlane E; Welton NJ; O'Connor L; Cawthorne J; George RP; Crosbie EJ; Rithalia AD; Cheng HY
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD012653. PubMed ID: 29406579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
    Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adherence of systematic reviews to Cochrane RoB2 guidance was frequently poor: a meta epidemiological study.
    Minozzi S; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Cinquini M; Berardinelli D; Cagnazzo C; Ciardullo S; De Nardi P; Gammone M; Iovino P; Lando A; Rissone M; Simeone G; Stracuzzi M; Venezia G; Moja L; Costantino G;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():47-55. PubMed ID: 36156301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of bias over time in updates of Cochrane oral health reviews.
    Faggion CM; Aranda L; Pandis N; Alarcón MA; Diaz KT
    J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():63-68. PubMed ID: 30342067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.