477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3682141)
1. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
Woolf PK
JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
Misra DP; Ravindran V; Agarwal V
J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 33(46):e287. PubMed ID: 30416407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraud in science.
Altman L; Melcher L
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jun; 286(6383):2003-6. PubMed ID: 6409204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Editors and auditors.
Rennie D
JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
Bonnet F; Samama CM
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.
Friedman PJ
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1416-9. PubMed ID: 2406474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012.
Marušić A; Malički M; von Elm E
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 24969914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.
Kleinert S; Wager E
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):35-41. PubMed ID: 25711220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The integrity of the scientific literature.
Stewart WW; Feder N
Nature; 1987 Jan 15-21; 325(6101):207-14. PubMed ID: 3808019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of the journal editor in sustaining integrity in research.
Caelleigh AS
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S23-9. PubMed ID: 8373488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prometheus the impostor.
Laor N
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Mar; 290(6469):681-4. PubMed ID: 3918715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
Wager E; Williams P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.
Yankauer A
Am J Public Health; 1990 Apr; 80(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 2316756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific Fraud, Publication Bias, and Honorary Authorship in Nuclear Medicine.
Kwee TC; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee RM
J Nucl Med; 2023 Feb; 64(2):200-203. PubMed ID: 36215567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
