BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36821724)

  • 1. Optimal primary wound closure methods after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Davey MG; Browne F; Davey MS; Walsh SR; Kerin MJ; Lowery AJ
    BJS Open; 2023 Jan; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36821724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
    Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Toon CD; Allen VB; Davidson BR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD010365. PubMed ID: 24526375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared between staples and subcuticular suture technique for wound closure after primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nepal S; Ruangsomboon P; Udomkiat P; Unnanuntana A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Sep; 140(9):1255-1263. PubMed ID: 32424445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal wound closure techniques for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: A systematic review of cosmetic outcomes.
    Lee K; Ward N; Oremule B; Mani N
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Nov; 44(6):905-913. PubMed ID: 31145548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of wound closure techniques after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Perivoliotis K; Christodoulou P; Liapis S; Ziamas D; Ntentas I; Lytras D
    Updates Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(4):1225-1237. PubMed ID: 35604534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of adhesive surgical tape with the absorbable continuous subcuticular suture.
    Kolt JD
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Aug; 73(8):626-9. PubMed ID: 12887534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tuuli MG; Rampersad RM; Carbone JF; Stamilio D; Macones GA; Odibo AO
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.