192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36823229)
1. The devil is in the details: a small-lesion sensitive weakly supervised learning framework for prostate cancer detection and grading.
Yang Z; Wang X; Xiang J; Zhang J; Yang S; Wang X; Yang W; Li Z; Han X; Liu Y
Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):525-538. PubMed ID: 36823229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification.
Otálora S; Marini N; Müller H; Atzori M
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):77. PubMed ID: 33964886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic diagnosis and grading of Prostate Cancer with weakly supervised learning on whole slide images.
Xiang J; Wang X; Wang X; Zhang J; Yang S; Yang W; Han X; Liu Y
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jan; 152():106340. PubMed ID: 36481762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification.
Marini N; Otálora S; Müller H; Atzori M
Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102165. PubMed ID: 34303169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Whole Slide Lung Cancer Image Analysis.
Wang X; Chen H; Gan C; Lin H; Dou Q; Tsougenis E; Huang Q; Cai M; Heng PA
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2020 Sep; 50(9):3950-3962. PubMed ID: 31484154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based prescreening of large-bowel biopsies taken in the UK and Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.
Bilal M; Tsang YW; Ali M; Graham S; Hero E; Wahab N; Dodd K; Sahota H; Wu S; Lu W; Jahanifar M; Robinson A; Azam A; Benes K; Nimir M; Hewitt K; Bhalerao A; Eldaly H; Raza SEA; Gopalakrishnan K; Minhas F; Snead D; Rajpoot N
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Nov; 5(11):e786-e797. PubMed ID: 37890902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pathology Diagnosis Demonstrates Significant Gains in Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection.
Raciti P; Sue J; Retamero JA; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Thiagarajan D; Ebrahimzadeh Z; Viret J; Lee D; Schüffler PJ; DeMuth G; Gulturk E; Kanan C; Rothrock B; Reis-Filho J; Klimstra DS; Reuter V; Fuchs TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Oct; 147(10):1178-1185. PubMed ID: 36538386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking weakly-supervised deep learning pipelines for whole slide classification in computational pathology.
Ghaffari Laleh N; Muti HS; Loeffler CML; Echle A; Saldanha OL; Mahmood F; Lu MY; Trautwein C; Langer R; Dislich B; Buelow RD; Grabsch HI; Brenner H; Chang-Claude J; Alwers E; Brinker TJ; Khader F; Truhn D; Gaisa NT; Boor P; Hoffmeister M; Schulz V; Kather JN
Med Image Anal; 2022 Jul; 79():102474. PubMed ID: 35588568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.
Raciti P; Sue J; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Kapur S; Reuter V; Grady L; Kanan C; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2058-2066. PubMed ID: 32393768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer histology identification and grading.
Morozov A; Taratkin M; Bazarkin A; Rivas JG; Puliatti S; Checcucci E; Belenchon IR; Kowalewski KF; Shpikina A; Singla N; Teoh JYC; Kozlov V; Rodler S; Piazza P; Fajkovic H; Yakimov M; Abreu AL; Cacciamani GE; Enikeev D;
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):681-692. PubMed ID: 37185992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Weakly-supervised learning for lung carcinoma classification using deep learning.
Kanavati F; Toyokawa G; Momosaki S; Rambeau M; Kozuma Y; Shoji F; Yamazaki K; Takeo S; Iizuka O; Tsuneki M
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9297. PubMed ID: 32518413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
