184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36825134)
1. Experimentally testing mate preference in an avian system with unidirectional bill color introgression.
McDiarmid CS; Finch F; Peso M; van Rooij E; Hooper DM; Rowe M; Griffith SC
Ecol Evol; 2023 Feb; 13(2):e9812. PubMed ID: 36825134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior.
Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H
Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex chromosome linkage of mate preference and color signal maintains assortative mating between interbreeding finch morphs.
Pryke SR
Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1301-10. PubMed ID: 19922444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assortative mating enhances postzygotic barriers to gene flow via ancestry bundling.
Muralidhar P; Coop G; Veller C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(30):e2122179119. PubMed ID: 35858444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unidirectional introgression of a sexually selected trait across an avian hybrid zone: a role for female choice?
Stein AC; Uy JA
Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1476-85. PubMed ID: 16929664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assortative mating preferences among hybrids offers a route to hybrid speciation.
Melo MC; Salazar C; Jiggins CD; Linares M
Evolution; 2009 Jun; 63(6):1660-5. PubMed ID: 19492995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.
Bay RA; Arnegard ME; Conte GL; Best J; Bedford NL; McCann SR; Dubin ME; Chan YF; Jones FC; Kingsley DM; Schluter D; Peichel CL
Curr Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PubMed ID: 29056455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assortative Mating in Hybrid Zones Is Remarkably Ineffective in Promoting Speciation.
Irwin DE
Am Nat; 2020 Jun; 195(6):E150-E167. PubMed ID: 32469663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating evidence of mitonuclear incompatibilities with the sex chromosomes in an avian hybrid zone.
Lopez KA; McDiarmid CS; Griffith SC; Lovette IJ; Hooper DM
Evolution; 2021 Jun; 75(6):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 33908624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
Conte GL; Schluter D
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential rates of phenotypic introgression are associated with male behavioral responses to multiple signals.
Greig EI; Baldassarre DT; Webster MS
Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2602-12. PubMed ID: 26292844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. COLOR PATTERN EVOLUTION, ASSORTATIVE MATING, AND GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN BRIGHTLY COLORED BUTTERFLYFISHES (CHAETODONTIDAE).
McMillan WO; Weigt LA; Palumbi SR
Evolution; 1999 Feb; 53(1):247-260. PubMed ID: 28565173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mate choice in Mus musculus is relative and dependent on the estrous state.
Zinck L; Lima SQ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66064. PubMed ID: 23762466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divergent warning patterns contribute to assortative mating between incipient Heliconius species.
Merrill RM; Chia A; Nadeau NJ
Ecol Evol; 2014 Apr; 4(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 24772270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kin selection may contribute to lek evolution and trait introgression across an avian hybrid zone.
Concannon MR; Stein AC; Uy JA
Mol Ecol; 2012 Mar; 21(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 22320709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetric dominance and asymmetric mate choice oppose premating isolation after allopatric divergence.
Sefc KM; Hermann CM; Steinwender B; Brindl H; Zimmermann H; Mattersdorfer K; Postl L; Makasa L; Sturmbauer C; Koblmüller S
Ecol Evol; 2015 Apr; 5(8):1549-62. PubMed ID: 25937900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of assortative mating in medaka: Mate discrimination cues and factors that bias sexual preference.
Utagawa U; Higashi S; Kamei Y; Fukamachi S
Horm Behav; 2016 Aug; 84():9-17. PubMed ID: 27260680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Asymmetric introgression reveals the genetic architecture of a plumage trait.
Semenov GA; Linck E; Enbody ED; Harris RB; Khaydarov DR; Alström P; Andersson L; Taylor SA
Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):1019. PubMed ID: 33589637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
