These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36825952)

  • 1. Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners.
    Srinivasan N; O'Neill S
    Audiol Res; 2023 Feb; 13(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 36825952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.
    Dwyer NY; Firszt JB; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 24084062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss.
    Banh J; Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):81-91; quiz 139-40. PubMed ID: 22353676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness.
    House JW; Kutz JW; Chung J; Fisher LM
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Mar; 120(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 20131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
    Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a French-Language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Moulin A; Richard C
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):412-23. PubMed ID: 26808287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?
    Bamiou DE; Iliadou VV; Zanchetta S; Spyridakou C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):824-37. PubMed ID: 26554488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Rooth MA; King ER; Deres EJ; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(4-5):259-271. PubMed ID: 29298446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity to temporal fine structure and hearing-aid outcomes in older adults.
    Perez E; McCormack A; Edmonds BA
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():7. PubMed ID: 24550769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 7789669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional consequences of extended high frequency hearing impairment: Evidence from the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale.
    Saxena U; Mishra SK; Rodrigo H; Choudhury M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Nov; 152(5):2946. PubMed ID: 36456291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sources of variability of speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired populations.
    Moulin A; Richard C
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 26624277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Nabelek AK; Tampas JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 18230861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of an abutment-level superpower sound processor for bone-anchored hearing.
    Bosman AJ; Kruyt IJ; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS; Snik AFM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 43(4):1019-1024. PubMed ID: 29450971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).
    Löhler J; Gräbner F; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 274(10):3593-3598. PubMed ID: 28756570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implant in patients with single sided deafness: hearing results and communicative benefits.
    García JM; Urquijo DP; Puerta M; Mosquera CA; Hernández LM; Aparicio ML; Barón C; Otoya Tono AM; Peñaranda A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):136-144. PubMed ID: 31741427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.
    Dornhoffer JR; Meyer TA; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(4):215-223. PubMed ID: 32241007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.