70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36826114)
21. A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S; Cai J; Li R; Wang Y; Zhao J; Huang Y; Xu L; Yang Q; Wang Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):623-637. PubMed ID: 35061066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume early-stage cervical cancer.
Coronado PJ; Gracia M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 92():102434. PubMed ID: 38134716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study.
Aubrey C; Pond GR; Helpman L; Vicus D; Elit L; Plante M; Lau S; Kwon JS; Altman AD; Willows K; Feigenberg T; Sabourin J; Samouelian V; Bernard L; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Piedimonte S; Teo-Fortin LA; Kim SR; Sadeq N; Jang JH; Shamiya S; Nelson G
Curr Oncol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 36826114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Ding Y; Zhang X; Qiu J; Li C; Hua K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 36329212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical margin status in relation to surgical approach in the management of early-stage cervical Cancer: A Canadian cervical Cancer collaborative (4C) study.
Piedimonte S; Helpman L; Pond G; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Samouelian V; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Vicus D; Plante M;
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():21-27. PubMed ID: 37146436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.
Chacon E; Manzour N; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Núñez-Córdoba JM; Martin-Calvo N; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Gil Moreno A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Boria F; Alcazar JL; Chiva L; ;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Feb; 32(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 35039455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is prior conization the way forward to determine surgical approach? The answer is not so simple!
Nasioudis D; Ramirez PT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Feb; 32(2):125-126. PubMed ID: 35039454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.
Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Lopez Blanco A; Humberto Fregnani J; Lopes A; Perrotta M; Tsunoda AT; Cantú-de-León DF; Ramondetta LM; Manchana T; Crotzer DR; McNally OM; Riege M; Scambia G; Carvajal JM; Di Guilmi J; Rendon GJ; Ramalingam P; Fellman BM; Coleman RL; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 34493587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?
Benoit L; Koual M; Nguyen-Xuan HT; Balaya V; Nos C; Montero-Macías R; Bats AS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):231-239. PubMed ID: 32964259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Radical Hysterectomy (RRH) for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Baroni C; Achilarre MT; Aloisi A; Betella I; Bogliolo S; Garbi A; Maruccio M; Multinu F; Aletti G; Maggioni A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 32860175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
