171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36826114)
41. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
Kim JH; Shim SH; Nam SH; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 32084588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Is there a relationship between surgical proficiency and oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer?
Ahn JH; Yun J; Yun CY; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Yoon JH; Park DC; Kim SI
Int J Med Sci; 2023; 20(4):551-556. PubMed ID: 37057205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.
Baiocchi G; Ribeiro R; Dos Reis R; Falcao DF; Lopes A; Costa RLR; Pinto GLS; Vieira M; Kumagai LY; Faloppa CC; Mantoan H; Badiglian-Filho L; Tsunoda AT; Foiato TF; Andrade CEMC; Palmeira LO; Gonçalves BT; Zanvettor PH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 34545531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Application of Da Vinci robotic surgery system in cervical cancer: A single institution experience of 557 cases.
Li J; Gong X; Li P; Xiao L; Chang X; Ouyang X; Tang J
Asian J Surg; 2022 Feb; 45(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34373166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume early-stage cervical cancer.
Coronado PJ; Gracia M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 92():102434. PubMed ID: 38134716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Adjuvant hysterectomy following primary chemoradiation for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a retrospective comparison of complications for open versus minimally invasive surgery.
Miller H; Matsuo K; Roman LD; Yessaian AA; Pham HQ; Hom M; Castaneda A; Pham A; Ragab O; Muderspach L; Ciccone M; Brunette LL
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 34187504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Protective Role of Conization Before Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
Bizzarri N; Pedone Anchora L; Kucukmetin A; Ratnavelu N; Korompelis P; Carbone V; Fedele C; Bruno M; Vizzielli G; Gallotta V; De Vincenzo R; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):3585-3594. PubMed ID: 33620615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Li LY; Wen LY; Park SH; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jan; 53(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 33070554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
