171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36826114)
61. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chen IN; Wang IT; Mu HY; Qiu JT; Liu WM; Chang CW; Chiu YH
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Apr; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 35565246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical nephrectomy for stage I and II renal cell carcinoma.
Dursun F; Elshabrawy A; Wang H; Rodriguez R; Liss MA; Kaushik D; Gelfond J; Mansour AM
Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Jun; 27(6):1068-1076. PubMed ID: 35319076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?
Benoit L; Koual M; Nguyen-Xuan HT; Balaya V; Nos C; Montero-Macías R; Bats AS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):231-239. PubMed ID: 32964259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Carcinomatosis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated with Robotic Radical Hysterectomy: Recurrence Patterns, Risk Factors, and Survival.
Fitzsimmons CK; Stephens AJ; Kennard JA; Manyam M; Pepe JW; Ahmad S; McKenzie ND; Kendrick JE; Holloway RW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):2006-2013. PubMed ID: 34757549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect of preoperative cervical conization before hysterectomy on survival and recurrence of patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han L; Chen Y; Zheng A; Chen H
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():167-174. PubMed ID: 37207501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. How to Select Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Still Suitable for Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: a Propensity-Matched Study.
Pedone Anchora L; Turco LC; Bizzarri N; Capozzi VA; Lombisani A; Chiantera V; De Felice F; Gallotta V; Cosentino F; Fagotti A; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 31898100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
