196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36827034)
21. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates--14 years experience.
Wiggins A; Austerberry R; Morrison D; Ho KM; Honeybul S
Neurosurgery; 2013 Feb; 72(2):248-56; discussion 256. PubMed ID: 23149967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Management of the Repeatedly Failed Cranioplasty Following Large Postdecompressive Craniectomy: Establishing the Efficacy of Staged Free Latissimus Dorsi Transfer/Tissue Expansion/Custom Polyetheretherketone Implant Reconstruction.
Mundinger GS; Latham K; Friedrich J; Louie O; Said H; Birgfeld C; Ellenbogen R; Hopper RA
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):1971-1977. PubMed ID: 28005736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advanced cranial reconstruction using intracranial free flaps and cranial bone grafts: an algorithmic approach developed from the modern battlefield.
Kumar AR; Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 23096610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy.
Stephens FL; Mossop CM; Bell RS; Tigno T; Rosner MK; Kumar A; Moores LE; Armonda RA
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E3. PubMed ID: 20568943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term Outcomes of Cranioplasty: Titanium Mesh Is Not a Long-term Solution in High-risk Patients.
Kwiecien GJ; Rueda S; Couto RA; Hashem A; Nagel S; Schwarz GS; Zins JE; Gastman BR
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 81(4):416-422. PubMed ID: 30059381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.
Rocque BG; Agee BS; Thompson EM; Piedra M; Baird LC; Selden NR; Greene S; Deibert CP; Hankinson TC; Lew SM; Iskandar BJ; Bragg TM; Frim D; Grant G; Gupta N; Auguste KI; Nikas DC; Vassilyadi M; Muh CR; Wetjen NM; Lam SK
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2018 Sep; 22(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 29882736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Role of Plastic Surgery in the Treatment of Titanium Mesh Exposure Following Cranioplasty.
Wang H; Li N; Bao Q; Shao Z; Hu X; Ma Q
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1080-1083. PubMed ID: 38829144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Complications of skull reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy.
Herteleer M; Ectors N; Duflou J; Van Calenbergh F
Acta Chir Belg; 2017 Jun; 117(3):149-156. PubMed ID: 27931166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy.
Archavlis E; Carvi Y Nievas M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 22527574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. A prospective series analyzing complications and clinical improvement.
Paredes I; Castaño-León AM; Munarriz PM; Martínez-Perez R; Cepeda S; Sanz R; Alén JF; Lagares A
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2015; 26(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 25497290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Partial Cranial Reconstruction Using Titanium Mesh after Craniectomy: An Antiadhesive and Protective Barrier with Improved Aesthetic Outcomes.
Figueroa-Sanchez JA; Martinez HR; Riaño-Espinoza M; Avalos-Montes PJ; Moran-Guerrero JA; Solorzano-Lopez EJ; Perez-Martinez LE; Flores-Salcido RE
World Neurosurg; 2024 May; 185():207-215. PubMed ID: 38403012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comprehensive functional outcome analysis and importance of bone remodelling on personalized cranioplasty treatment using Poly(methyl methacrylate) bone flaps.
Iratwar S; Roy Chowdhury S; Pisulkar S; Das S; Agarwal A; Bagde A; Paikrao B; Quazi S; Basu B
J Biomater Appl; 2024 Apr; 38(9):975-988. PubMed ID: 38423069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How "successful" is calvarial reconstruction using frozen autologous bone?
Honeybul S; Ho KM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 23096611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcomes of cranioplasty with synthetic materials and autologous bone grafts.
Piitulainen JM; Kauko T; Aitasalo KM; Vuorinen V; Vallittu PK; Posti JP
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 25681593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical Decision-Making in Microvascular Reconstruction of Composite Scalp and Skull Defects.
Vargo JD; Przylecki W; Andrews BT
J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 31(7):1895-1899. PubMed ID: 32604312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients.
Morton RP; Abecassis IJ; Hanson JF; Barber JK; Chen M; Kelly CM; Nerva JD; Emerson SN; Ene CI; Levitt MR; Chowdhary MM; Ko AL; Chesnut RM
J Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 128(6):1648-1652. PubMed ID: 28799868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Salvage of postcranioplasty implant exposure using free tissue transfer.
Chou PY; Lin CH; Hsu CC; Yang WH; Kane AA; Lin CH
Head Neck; 2017 Aug; 39(8):1655-1661. PubMed ID: 28514018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of systematic scalp expansion before cranioplasty in patients with craniectomy defects.
Merlino G; Carlucci S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26189142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A case series of early and late cranioplasty-comparison of surgical outcomes.
Bjornson A; Tajsic T; Kolias AG; Wells A; Naushahi MJ; Anwar F; Helmy A; Timofeev I; Hutchinson PJ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Mar; 161(3):467-472. PubMed ID: 30715606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
