160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36827325)
1. Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research.
Gupta A; Bosco F
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281938. PubMed ID: 36827325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread
Hartgerink CH
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3068. PubMed ID: 28265523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
Friese M; Frankenbach J
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of
Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD
R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):220346. PubMed ID: 36778954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research.
Bruns SB; Ioannidis JP
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149144. PubMed ID: 26886098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value.
Bishop DV; Thompson PA
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1715. PubMed ID: 26925335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014)": Correction to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014).
Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 143(11):iii. PubMed ID: 29048180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail.
Bin Abd Razak HR; Ang JE; Attal H; Howe TS; Allen JC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):e91. PubMed ID: 27869632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
Andrade C
J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model.
Fitzpatrick BG; Gorman DM; Trombatore C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303262. PubMed ID: 38753677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials.
Damen JA; Heus P; Lamberink HJ; Tijdink JK; Bouter L; Glasziou P; Moher D; Otte WM; Vinkers CH; Hooft L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 154():23-32. PubMed ID: 36470577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
