These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare. Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlling Within-Field Sheep Movement Using Virtual Fencing. Marini D; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social influence on the effectiveness of virtual fencing in sheep. Marini D; Kearton T; Ouzman J; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10066. PubMed ID: 33062448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporary Exclusion of Cattle from a Riparian Zone Using Virtual Fencing Technology. Campbell DLM; Haynes SJ; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Lee C Animals (Basel); 2018 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30583490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing an Ethically Acceptable Virtual Fencing System for Sheep. Marini D; Meuleman MD; Belson S; Rodenburg TB; Llewellyn R; Lee C Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual Fence Responses Are Socially Facilitated in Beef Cattle. Keshavarzi H; Lee C; Lea JM; Campbell DLM Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():543158. PubMed ID: 33195516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing. Hamidi D; Grinnell NA; Komainda M; Riesch F; Horn J; Ammer S; Traulsen I; Palme R; Hamidi M; Isselstein J Animal; 2022 Sep; 16(9):100614. PubMed ID: 35985122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. II: Effects on cow welfare and behavior. Verdon M; Langworthy A; Rawnsley R J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7084-7094. PubMed ID: 33814145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines. Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Virtual Fencing Work for Grazing Dairy Cattle? Lomax S; Colusso P; Clark CEF Animals (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31288490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards a Virtual Fencing System: Training Domestic Sheep Using Audio Stimuli. Kleanthous N; Hussain A; Sneddon J; Khan W; Khan B; Aung Z; Liatsis P Animals (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 36359044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should Dairy Cattle Be Trained to a Virtual Fence System as Individuals or in Groups? Colusso PI; Clark CEF; Lomax S Animals (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33003613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Assess the Welfare Impacts of a New Virtual Fencing Technology. Lee C; Campbell DLM Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():637709. PubMed ID: 33708813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of ewes with lambs to learn a virtual fencing system. Brunberg EI; Bergslid IK; Bøe KE; Sørheim KM Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):2045-2050. PubMed ID: 28490388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare. Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Korsgaard AH; Trige-Esbensen A; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D; Frikke J; Linder AC Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35405832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]