148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3683110)
1. Multiple classification and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Steinbach WR; Richter K
Med Decis Making; 1987; 7(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 3683110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.
Gur D; Bandos AI; King JL; Klym AH; Cohen CS; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Perrin RL; Poller WR; Shah R; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Rockette HE
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4404-9. PubMed ID: 18975686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.
Swensson RG
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1709-25. PubMed ID: 8946368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ideal observers and optimal ROC hypersurfaces in N-class classification.
Edwards DC; Metz CE; Kupinski MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):891-5. PubMed ID: 15250641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists', pulmonologists', and anesthesiologists' performance.
Monnier-Cholley L; Carrat F; Cholley BP; Tubiana JM; Arrivé L
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 15486213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.
Park SH; Goo JM; Jo CH
Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15064554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of restricted ROC surfaces in three-class classification tasks.
Edwards DC; Metz CE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1345-56. PubMed ID: 17948725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shannon information and ROC analysis in imaging.
Clarkson E; Cushing JB
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1288-301. PubMed ID: 26367158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restricted ROC curves are useful tools to evaluate the performance of tumour markers.
Parodi S; Muselli M; Carlini B; Fontana V; Haupt R; Pistoia V; Corrias MV
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):294-314. PubMed ID: 22735161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for intelligent medical systems--a new approach for finding confidence intervals.
Tilbury JB; Van Eetvelt PW; Garibaldi JM; Curnow JS; Ifeachor EC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jul; 47(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10916267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Roubidoux MA; Wilson TE; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Newman JS; Sanjay-Gopal S
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 10478252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.
Chakraborty DP
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3463-82. PubMed ID: 16825743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.
Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Yoshimoto M; Mochizuki T; Murase K
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17386991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer study of a prototype clinical decision support system for breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Boroczky L; Simpson M; Abe H; Drysdale J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 23345346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and classification of lung cancers on chest radiographs ROC analysis of radiologists' performance.
Shiraishi J; Abe H; Li F; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):995-1003. PubMed ID: 16843852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
Burgess AE
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 16399036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]