These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3683181)

  • 1. Further explorations of the consistency effect in word and nonword pronunciation.
    Stanhope N; Parkin AJ
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Mar; 15(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 3683181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From SOFA to LOUCH: lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation.
    Rosson MB
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 6865749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudowords, and letters.
    Rossmeissl PG; Theios J
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 7176904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: evidence for phonological processing.
    Besner D; Davelaar E
    Can J Psychol; 1983 Jun; 37(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 6616344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference.
    Lupker SJ
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 7172126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria.
    Waters GS; Seidenberg MS
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Nov; 13(6):557-72. PubMed ID: 3831712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word recognition in early reading: a review of the direct and indirect access hypotheses.
    Barron RW
    Cognition; 1986 Nov; 24(1-2):93-119. PubMed ID: 3539489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect.
    Estes WK; Brunn JL
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Nov; 42(5):411-22. PubMed ID: 3696936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition.
    Humphreys GW; Evett LJ; Taylor DE
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Nov; 10(6):576-90. PubMed ID: 7162419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word context effects on letter recognition.
    Jacewicz MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 1):935-42. PubMed ID: 482048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Errors in proofreading: evidence for the use of word shape in word recognition.
    Monk AF; Hulme C
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jan; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 6855555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthographic vs. phonological irregularity in lexical decision.
    Parkin AJ; Underwood G
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 6633253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual letter-matching and the time course of visual and acoustic codes.
    Carrasco M; Kinchla RA; Figueroa JG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3245474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.
    Seidenberg MS
    Cognition; 1985 Feb; 19(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 4039640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring sublexical correspondences from sight vocabulary: evidence from 6- and 7-year-olds.
    Stuart M; Masterson J; Dixon M; Quinlan P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 10371874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition.
    Frost R; Katz L
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 2725267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective judgments of spelling-sound correspondences: effects of word regularity and word frequency.
    Barber PJ; Millar DG
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 7176906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing times for English and Chinese words.
    Hoosain R; Osgood CE
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 6664815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.