These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3683223)
21. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare. O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Instrumentation of a telemetry system for monitoring fetal and neonatal cardiac activity. Hess OW; Litvenko W Conn Med; 1979 Jan; 43(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 759107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The nonstress test. Transmission from the home. Acker DB; Corwin M; Sachs BP; Schulman E J Reprod Med; 1989 Dec; 34(12):971-4. PubMed ID: 2621739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Evidence of biorhythmic organization of the fetal heart rate. Technic of prolonged electrocardiographic recording]. Ugartechea JC; López García R; Shor Pinsker V; Neri Méndez C; Zaldívar Neal A; Karchmer Krivitzky S Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Apr; 52(324):81-8. PubMed ID: 6489796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Characteristics of the frequency spectrum of the fetal electrocardiogram]. Eisenberg de Smoler P; Lindig M; Domínguez de Costa CG Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Oct; 52(330):241-6. PubMed ID: 6510735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Fetal electrocardiogram enhancement by time-sequenced adaptive filtering. Ferrara ER; Widrow B IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Jun; 29(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 7106797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Changes in and characteristics of the monitoring of the reactivity and variability of the heart rate of the premature fetus during a non stress test (NST)]. Ivanov S; Georgiev R Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1983; 22(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 6638376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring: value of sound stimulation. Trudinger BJ; Boylan P Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Feb; 55(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 7352091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparative evaluation of the TM and Doppler methods in detecting fetal cardiac activity in the I trimester of pregnancy]. Stygar AM Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1980 Aug; 25(8):64-6. PubMed ID: 7415041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Cardiotocographic criteria for the fetus at risk]. Bruchác D Cesk Gynekol; 1980 Jun; 45(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 7397846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [A new ECG electrode concept for the conduction of fetal heart action potentials without penetration of the skin]. Schmidt S; Langner K; Rothe J; Saling E Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1982 Oct; 186(5):242-3. PubMed ID: 6891152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electronic fetal monitoring. Council on Scientific Affairs. JAMA; 1981 Nov; 246(20):2370-3. PubMed ID: 7299960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone]. Pan J; Ye M; Du X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Signal ambiguity resulting in unexpected outcome with external fetal heart rate monitoring. Neilson DR; Freeman RK; Mangan S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 18377859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]