198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36833337)
41. Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.
VanRaden PM; Sun C; O'Connell JR
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():82. PubMed ID: 26168789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies.
Howie BN; Donnelly P; Marchini J
PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000529. PubMed ID: 19543373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Examining the Impact of Imputation Errors on Fine-Mapping Using DNA Methylation QTL as a Model Trait.
Chundru VK; Marioni RE; Prendergast JGD; Vallerga CL; Lin T; Beveridge AJ; ; Gratten J; Hume DA; Deary IJ; Wray NR; Visscher PM; McRae AF
Genetics; 2019 Jul; 212(3):577-586. PubMed ID: 31040117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accurate haplotype imputation with individualized ancestry-adjusted reference panels.
Song Q; Xu W; Li W; He S; Liu J; Wang G; Ma L
Genomics; 2018 Sep; 110(5):329-335. PubMed ID: 29198611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Harmonization of study and reference data by PhaseLift: saving time when imputing study data.
Gorski M; Winkler TW; Stark K; Müller-Nurasyid M; Ried JS; Grallert H; Weber BH; Heid IM
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 38(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 24962562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Methods of tagSNP selection and other variables affecting imputation accuracy in swine.
Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Schwab C; Fix J; Van Tassell CP; Steibel JP
BMC Genet; 2013 Feb; 14():8. PubMed ID: 23433396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. EagleImp: fast and accurate genome-wide phasing and imputation in a single tool.
Wienbrandt L; Ellinghaus D
Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 38(22):4999-5006. PubMed ID: 36130053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Haplotype reference consortium panel: Practical implications of imputations with large reference panels.
Iglesias AI; van der Lee SJ; Bonnemaijer PWM; Höhn R; Nag A; Gharahkhani P; Khawaja AP; Broer L; ; Foster PJ; Hammond CJ; Hysi PG; van Leeuwen EM; MacGregor S; Mackey DA; Mazur J; Nickels S; Uitterlinden AG; Klaver CCW; Amin N; van Duijn CM
Hum Mutat; 2017 Aug; 38(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 28493391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The hazards of genotype imputation when mapping disease susceptibility variants.
Lau W; Ali A; Maude H; Andrew T; Swallow DM; Maniatis N
Genome Biol; 2024 Jan; 25(1):7. PubMed ID: 38172955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Performance of genotype imputation for low frequency and rare variants from the 1000 genomes.
Zheng HF; Rong JJ; Liu M; Han F; Zhang XW; Richards JB; Wang L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116487. PubMed ID: 25621886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Genotype imputation for Han Chinese population using Haplotype Reference Consortium as reference.
Lin Y; Liu L; Yang S; Li Y; Lin D; Zhang X; Yin X
Hum Genet; 2018 Jul; 137(6-7):431-436. PubMed ID: 29855708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A coalescent model for genotype imputation.
Jewett EM; Zawistowski M; Rosenberg NA; Zöllner S
Genetics; 2012 Aug; 191(4):1239-55. PubMed ID: 22595242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Performance of genotype imputation for rare variants identified in exons and flanking regions of genes.
Li L; Li Y; Browning SR; Browning BL; Slater AJ; Kong X; Aponte JL; Mooser VE; Chissoe SL; Whittaker JC; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24945. PubMed ID: 21949800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improved imputation of low-frequency and rare variants using the UK10K haplotype reference panel.
Huang J; Howie B; McCarthy S; Memari Y; Walter K; Min JL; Danecek P; Malerba G; Trabetti E; Zheng HF; ; Gambaro G; Richards JB; Durbin R; Timpson NJ; Marchini J; Soranzo N
Nat Commun; 2015 Sep; 6():8111. PubMed ID: 26368830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Regional genetic differences among Japanese populations and performance of genotype imputation using whole-genome reference panel of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project.
Yasuda J; Katsuoka F; Danjoh I; Kawai Y; Kojima K; Nagasaki M; Saito S; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Tadaka S; Motoike IN; Kumada K; Sakurai-Yageta M; Tanabe O; Fuse N; Tamiya G; Higasa K; Matsuda F; Yasuda N; Iwasaki M; Sasaki M; Shimizu A; Kinoshita K; Yamamoto M
BMC Genomics; 2018 Jul; 19(1):551. PubMed ID: 30041597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Reconstruction of private genomes through reference-based genotype imputation.
Mosca MJ; Cho H
Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):271. PubMed ID: 38053191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A combined reference panel from the 1000 Genomes and UK10K projects improved rare variant imputation in European and Chinese samples.
Chou WC; Zheng HF; Cheng CH; Yan H; Wang L; Han F; Richards JB; Karasik D; Kiel DP; Hsu YH
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39313. PubMed ID: 28004816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A resampling-based approach to share reference panels.
Cavinato T; Rubinacci S; Malaspinas AS; Delaneau O
Nat Comput Sci; 2024 May; 4(5):360-366. PubMed ID: 38745108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
