These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 368348)

  • 1. Comparison between moist swab and tissue biopsy methods for quantitation of bacteria in experimental incisional wounds.
    Bornside GH; Bornside BB
    J Trauma; 1979 Feb; 19(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 368348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantitative swab is a good non-invasive alternative to a quantitative biopsy for quantifying bacterial load in wounds healing by second intention in horses.
    Van Hecke LL; Hermans K; Haspeslagh M; Chiers K; Pint E; Boyen F; Martens AM
    Vet J; 2017 Jul; 225():63-68. PubMed ID: 28720301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample procurement for cultures of infected wounds: a systematic review.
    Copeland-Halperin LR; Kaminsky AJ; Bluefeld N; Miraliakbari R
    J Wound Care; 2016 Apr; 25(4):S4-6, S8-10. PubMed ID: 27068349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two culturing methods for chronic wounds.
    Neil JA; Munro CL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Apr; 43(3):20-2, 24, 26 passim. PubMed ID: 9205389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.
    Chovanec Z; Veverkova L; Votava M; Svoboda J; Jedlicka V; Capov I
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Dec; 15(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 25478933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infected surface wound: an experimental model and a method for the quantitation of bacteria in infected tissues.
    Saymen DG; Nathan P; Holder IA; Hill EO; Macmillan BG
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Mar; 23(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 4623279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds.
    Bill TJ; Ratliff CR; Donovan AM; Knox LK; Morgan RF; Rodeheaver GT
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Jan; 47(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 11889654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bacteriologic culture results for skin wound swabs and skin wound biopsy specimens.
    Stokes RA; Coleman MC; Rogovskyy AS; Dickerson VM; Thieman Mankin KM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Dec; 259(12):1416-1421. PubMed ID: 34757939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
    Van Horn KG; Audette CD; Tucker KA; Sebeck D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Dec; 62(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 18814991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of bacteria in operation wounds--an experimental investigation with swab sampling in pigs.
    Nyström PO
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1980 Apr; 88(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 6990687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Culture results from wound biopsy versus wound swab: does it matter for the assessment of wound infection?
    Haalboom M; Blokhuis-Arkes MHE; Beuk RJ; Meerwaldt R; Klont R; Schijffelen MJ; Bowler PB; Burnet M; Sigl E; van der Palen JAM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 May; 25(5):629.e7-629.e12. PubMed ID: 30145403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection.
    Gardner SE; Frantz RA; Saltzman CL; Hillis SL; Park H; Scherubel M
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(5):548-57. PubMed ID: 17014666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective evaluation of the influence of sampling method on bacterial culture results and antimicrobial selection in 52 dogs with infected wounds.
    Concannon TM; Kidd L; Osmond C; Dong F; Griffon D
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2020 Mar; 30(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 32056364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds.
    Levine NS; Lindberg RB; Mason AD; Pruitt BA
    J Trauma; 1976 Feb; 16(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 1255833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Velvet pad surface sampling of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria: an in vitro laboratory model.
    Raahave D; Friis-Møller A
    J Clin Pathol; 1982 Dec; 35(12):1356-60. PubMed ID: 6757273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wound swab use and misuse at a regional general hospital.
    Fenech M; Abela R; Chetcuti Zammit S; Mercieca L; Gauci J; Edwards N; Carachi E; Mifsud M; Piscopo T
    J Wound Care; 2014 Dec; 23(12):634-42. PubMed ID: 25492280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial flora of combat wounds from eastern Ukraine and time-specified changes of bacterial recovery during treatment in Ukrainian military hospital.
    Valentine KP; Viacheslav KM
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):152. PubMed ID: 28388920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone.
    Slater RA; Lazarovitch T; Boldur I; Ramot Y; Buchs A; Weiss M; Hindi A; Rapoport MJ
    Diabet Med; 2004 Jul; 21(7):705-9. PubMed ID: 15209762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of wound irrigation by pulsatile jet and conventional methods.
    Brown LL; Shelton HT; Bornside GH; Cohn I
    Ann Surg; 1978 Feb; 187(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 343735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Swabs and other sampling techniques.
    Lawrence JC; Ameen H
    J Wound Care; 1998 May; 7(5):232-3. PubMed ID: 9677989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.