190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36837612)
1. Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Riemma G; Pasanisi F; Reino A; Solazzo MC; Ronsini C
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 36837612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.
Paek J; Lee JD; Kong TW; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1043-50. PubMed ID: 26092018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.
Jayakumaran J; Wiercinski K; Buffington C; Caceres A
J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 29027639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes.
Sendag F; Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozdemir A; Gunusen I; Oztekin MK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 24530696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prodromidou A; Spartalis E; Tsourouflis G; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):679-686. PubMed ID: 31956926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
Sunkara S; Guan X
Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP® surgical system for benign gynecologic disease: A preliminary report.
Shin HJ; Yoo HK; Lee JH; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 59(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 32127145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
Capozzi VA; Armano G; Rosati A; Tropea A; Biondi A
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):1155-1167. PubMed ID: 32472402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
